Are learning resources working for art and design students?

By Student Voice Analytics
learning resourceshistory of art, architecture and design

Mostly. Across the learning resources lens in the UK National Student Survey (NSS), 14,058 open‑text comments show 67.7% Positive sentiment, yet a −7.4 index‑point accessibility gap persists for disabled students. Within history of art, architecture and design, a discipline grouping used across UK higher education, ~947 comments highlight library expectations and access as a live issue, with Library mentions carrying a modestly positive tone of +5.4. These sector patterns shape what follows: prioritise inclusive routes to core texts and images, flexible access to specialist software, and simple signposting that reduces friction on and off campus.

How are library and online access evolving for art, architecture and design?

Library services now blend physical and digital provision. Universities introduce ‘click and collect’ for print alongside extensive remote access to tools such as Photoshop and Illustrator. For design students who rely on visual software for coursework, capacity and licence checks before term start reduce bottlenecks. Integration with platforms like Moodle and Lecturecast enables students to revisit materials at pace. To close the accessibility gap, services provide alternative formats by default, simplify off‑campus log‑ins with step‑by‑step guidance, and surface assistive routes at the point of need. Inter‑library loans continue to extend coverage for rare case studies.

How do we foster independent learning and research?

Students progress fastest when they can locate and use sources without friction. Institutions therefore provide single‑location signposting to core platforms, promote quick‑start guides at the start of each module, and embed short training on searching image databases and academic journals. Staff teach structured approaches to source evaluation and referencing (e.g. Chicago) and schedule targeted library skills sessions aligned to assessment briefs. This combination supports different study patterns across the cohort and helps students build confidence in selecting, citing and critiquing material.

Which teaching methods enhance engagement?

A mix of live and recorded lectures caters to varied preferences: live sessions for interaction and recorded content for review. Tutorials and seminars centre discussion of visual and contextual analysis, with staff using brief formative checkpoints to help students test ideas against marking criteria. Balancing contact time with directed independent study encourages students to apply methods, practise with resources and link scholarly arguments to studio or curatorial work.

How should students utilise university facilities and services?

Specialist libraries, image repositories, computer labs with current design software, and print studios underpin practice. Field trips and museum partnerships convert theory into situated analysis. Resource‑readiness checks before term verify software versions, equipment bookings and space capacity, with named owners per subject area to resolve issues quickly. Staff guide students to the right facilities for each assignment and encourage early booking during peak periods.

How do we gather and act on student feedback?

Universities collect insights through NSS, module evaluations and forums, then analyse patterns to target fixes. Publishing short update summaries closes the loop. To reduce friction for international and minority groups, helpdesks offer live chat and timely email during assignment peaks. Accessibility issues are tracked in a visible backlog with resolution times, ensuring changes to reading lists, licences or space access are transparent.

Which topic-specific resources support art history students?

Art history students benefit from high‑quality image databases with rights‑cleared downloads, exhibition catalogues, and access to curated archives. Because library expectations in this discipline are frequently discussed and only modestly positive, programmes refine reading‑list access, prioritise high‑demand texts, and ensure digital surrogates where originals are restricted. Collaborations with museums and galleries open up rare materials, while staff provide guidance on curatorial practice and primary‑source handling to connect material culture with scholarly interpretation.

What does this mean for practice?

  • Close the accessibility gap by offering alternative formats by default and explicit assistive routes in every system.
  • Transfer what works for mature and part‑time learners to the wider cohort: extended service windows, concise quick‑start guides, and clear signposting.
  • Run resource‑readiness checks for high‑demand software, equipment and spaces before teaching starts, with weekly issue capture and updates to students.
  • Simplify remote access steps and provide timely help during peak assessment periods.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

Student Voice Analytics shows topic volume and sentiment over time, from institution to school or programme, so teams can see where learning resources are working and where access falls short. You can compare like‑for‑like across discipline groupings and demographics, segment by mode or year, and export concise summaries for programme and service teams. For History of Art Architecture and Design, the platform highlights discipline‑specific patterns around library use, assessment expectations and communications, helping departments prioritise the fixes that will move sentiment most.

Request a walkthrough

Book a Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

  • All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
  • Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
  • Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.

More posts on learning resources:

More posts on history of art, architecture and design student views: