How do journalism students experience university support and communication?

communication with supervisor, lecturer, tutorjournalism

Journalism students value approachable staff and good resources, but they want faster, more consistent academic communication. Across the communication with supervisor, lecturer, tutor theme in National Student Survey (NSS) open‑text analysis, tone is 50.3% positive from 6,373 comments, while students in journalism lean more positive at 54.4%. Assessment clarity remains the pressure point: sentiment around marking criteria sits at −49.0, and communication is weakest for apprenticeships at −14.6. These patterns frame why response times, channel discipline and transparent assessment briefs drive the experience described below.

Clear and effective communication is a central part of the academic experience. Staff need to maintain open channels that facilitate the transfer of knowledge and foster a culture where students feel valued and heard. This post looks at how students relay their thoughts and concerns to their educators and the impact this has on their academic journey. By analysing student voices through surveys and text analysis, we gather inputs on communication aspects that shape daily university life. Understanding these interactions provides practical insight into effectiveness and areas needing improvement in student–staff dialogue. Situating the findings within UK sector trends for this communication theme and Journalism programmes clarifies where providers can act to enhance satisfaction and academic success.

Where does communication fall down for journalism students?

Students frequently report delays in responses to emails, difficulty in directly contacting lecturers, and uneven communication channels. These hinder timely learning and project completion. Directness and timeliness matter for journalism students working to deadlines and seeking swift feedback to refine work. Programmes should set service standards for response times, define which channels to use for different queries, and keep a single “source of truth” on the VLE for actions and decisions. Regular, structured updates reduce confusion and lift morale, supporting students as they navigate their modules.

How should staff availability work in practice?

Lecturers need to be accessible, with office hours that students can reliably book. Many students struggle to arrange timely interactions, leading to gaps in understanding and missed chances for deeper engagement. Simple fixes help: publish office hours and back‑up contacts when supervisors are on leave; provide an online booking system; and offer some out‑of‑hours slots for time‑poor learners. Guaranteed access enables continuous feedback, which matters for practice‑heavy journalism modules. Improving availability both provides guidance and signals sustained support across the programme.

What does effective feedback and marking look like for journalism?

Timely, actionable feedback on assignments builds learning and writing quality, while unclear assessment briefs and opaque marking criteria undermine confidence. In journalism feedback remains mixed, and sentiment around marking criteria is strongly negative (−49.0) when expectations are not explicit. Programmes should publish annotated exemplars, use checklist‑style rubrics aligned to the learning outcomes, and set a realistic, public feedback turnaround. Streamlining digital submission and feedback channels reduces delays so students receive marks and commentary when it still shapes their next piece.

What makes online learning communications work?

Online delivery can weaken engagement and create misunderstandings when face‑to‑face contact drops. Students need dependable routes to reach lecturers and tutors. Regular virtual office hours, predictable weekly digests, and swift responses to forum posts maintain momentum. Interactive tools such as discussion boards and live Q&A in teaching sessions allow real‑time clarification. These moves keep the digital experience personal and accessible for students working to newsroom‑style timelines.

How should tutor support operate?

Personal tutors anchor continuity and belonging. Proactive, short check‑ins at assessment pinch points and before placements help students anticipate workload and seek adjustments early. Tutors should confirm agreed adjustments in writing and offer alternative modes (captioned recordings, written summaries) to reduce barriers for disabled and mature students. Regular, scheduled contact supports motivation and engagement, and ensures student concerns are addressed promptly.

Which staff qualities strengthen communication?

Students respond to staff who combine subject expertise with responsiveness and respectful dialogue. Enthusiasm and open, constructive exchange encourage students to test ideas, seek advice and iterate work. Active, empathetic engagement turns routine updates into mentoring that builds confidence and a sense of community.

What course organisation changes will students feel most?

Disorganisation—overlapping modules, opaque booking systems, confusing assessment criteria—creates friction. Naming owners for scheduling and communications, using a single authoritative channel for changes, and issuing brief “what changed and why” notes when plans shift all reduce noise. Clarity and predictability free students to focus on learning rather than chasing information.

What changes make the biggest difference?

Set programme‑wide service standards for staff communication, publish office hours and back‑ups, and track response times in programme meetings. Make assessment clarity non‑negotiable with exemplars and rubrics, and streamline digital routes for queries and feedback. For cohorts with less flexibility—especially apprenticeships, where tone trends lower—offer predictable, asynchronous updates and targeted out‑of‑hours contact. These adjustments align with sector evidence and directly address what journalism students say they need.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

• Track topic and sentiment for communication with supervisors, lecturers and tutors over time, with drill‑downs by school/department, campus/site and cohort.
• Compare Journalism with other disciplines and student demographics on a like‑for‑like basis, and evidence change to programme boards with concise exports.
• Surface high‑impact fixes fast: anonymised summaries show what to prioritise now and which practices to scale, avoiding anecdote‑driven decisions.

Request a walkthrough

Book a Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

• All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
• Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
• Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.

Book a demo Prefer email? [email protected]

More posts on communication with supervisor, lecturer, tutor:

• Does communication shape learning for marketing students?
• How can design studies improve communication with students?
• Do politics students benefit from structured communication with academic staff?
• Does consistent staff-student communication improve dental education?

More posts on journalism student views:

• What do journalism students say about teaching staff?