They value them highly but expect reliable study space, discoverable resources and equitable digital access backed by responsive staff. In the Library theme of the National Student Survey (NSS), 65.0% of comments are positive, yielding a sentiment index of +30.1; across history, overall tone is more finely balanced at 51.9% Positive and 44.7% Negative, yet the library itself remains a relative strength for historians (sentiment +25.9). The Library theme aggregates student feedback on library provision across the sector, while the history subject classification groups discipline-level comments for comparable analysis. These patterns frame the issues below: space pressures, access to print and archives, digital equity, and the value of timely, expert help.
How does overcrowding and study space limit historical research?
Overcrowding reduces time on task and disrupts deep reading and writing. For history cohorts whose work depends on extended quiet study and access to print, constrained space becomes a performance issue rather than an inconvenience. Rising enrolments without commensurate expansion of study areas intensify stress and reduce productivity. Expanding bookable quiet zones, publishing occupancy data, extending opening hours during assessment peaks, and signposting alternative sites provide immediate relief. Universities should prioritise evening and weekend access routes to reduce friction for part-time and mature students, and track whether these adjustments shift sentiment in subsequent NSS cycles.
What has COVID-19 changed about access for historians?
COVID-19 restrictions curtailed access to archives and print holdings, with digital workarounds helpful but partial for disciplines reliant on material culture and manuscript handling. History students report that digital provision supports continuity but does not fully substitute for physical consultation. Libraries respond by widening click-and-collect, digitising high-demand chapters within licence, and communicating, in one place, what has changed and why. Where backlogs persist, modules should adapt assessment briefs to the sources students can actually access, with staff-led triage for rare and special collections.
How should digital resources support equitable access to history materials?
Digitisation widens reach but risks widening inequalities if connectivity, device access, or licensing limits block use. Libraries need to validate the end-to-end journey: authentication, discovery, file formats, captioning, screen-reader compatibility and loan rules. Publishing available adjustments and assistive technologies, alongside targeted equipment loans and off-campus access guidance, supports disabled, commuting and time-poor students. For historians, structured pathways to trusted databases and archives, with discipline-specific search strategies, reduce time lost to trial-and-error.
How do staff interactions shape historians’ use of the library?
Staff who provide calm, expert guidance on catalogue strategies, archival protocols and referencing improve confidence and research quality. Short, discipline-facing interventions work: drop-in clinics timed to assessment milestones, rapid-response chat outside typical hours, and module-embedded skills sessions on primary-source discovery. Capture and spread practice from higher-scoring areas where service touchpoints are responsive and visible, and maintain a simple feedback loop so students see changes quickly.
How can libraries ensure core texts and archives are available when needed?
Scarcity of core readings stalls dissertations and essays when several students need the same item. Reading list analytics should drive agile acquisitions, combining e-first licences with fair-use print, short-loan copies and scanning within licence frameworks. Align purchasing with module timetables and assessment briefs, and maintain a rolling process to identify understocked but essential titles. For special collections, pre-arranged slots, mediated digitisation and clear guidance on handling and reproduction reduce bottlenecks.
What would a better booking and collection journey look like?
Students want a predictable, low-friction path from discovery to study. Systems should show real-time availability, waitlist length and expected return dates; offer time-limited holds; provide simple self-service collection; and integrate notifications. For archives and restricted materials, a triaged route that captures research intent helps staff prepare viable alternatives when items are unavailable. Publish a short “you said, we did” and track the library sentiment index by cohort to evidence improvement.
How does course variety in history drive library use?
Varied modules—from medieval to modern—create diverse, time-sensitive demand profiles. Collections, skills support and staff expertise need to flex accordingly. Map option choices to collection strengths early, release reading lists on time, and stage targeted skills workshops pegged to likely source types. As module diets change, maintain agile purchasing and consult students on emergent needs mid-semester to prevent squeeze points.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics turns NSS open-text into topic and sentiment metrics for Library and History, with drill-downs by school, cohort and mode. It surfaces where tone diverges, helps teams prioritise space, access and skills interventions that shift sentiment, and evidences impact over time with like-for-like comparisons and concise, export-ready summaries for programme and library leaders.
Request a walkthrough
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
© Student Voice Systems Limited, All rights reserved.