Yes. National Student Survey (NSS) open-text analysis shows that extra-curricular activities attract strongly positive sentiment from students overall (76.5% Positive; index +44.1), but participation remains uneven for cohorts balancing other commitments, with part-time learners recording 41.3% negative sentiment. For history, the discipline narrative centres on academic quality and assessment clarity across 10,636 comments, with Marking criteria a pronounced pressure point (−46.8). In this context, targeted societies, debate, volunteering and skills-focused activities help translate expectations into practice, strengthen study habits, and widen access through timing, format and cost. Within the NSS, the category captures student commentary on enrichment beyond the curriculum; within the sector’s Common Academic Hierarchy, history aggregates discipline-specific feedback across UK providers.
What value do extracurricular activities add for history students?
Extracurricular activity complements the academic core by building teamwork, leadership and communication while sharpening analysis. For history students, debate clubs and historical societies provide live contexts to test arguments, practise oral briefing and connect historiography to contemporary issues. These spaces help students interpret assessment briefs and practise the standards expected in seminars and written work. Balancing coursework and activity commitments also strengthens time management, which students then apply to reading loads and staged assessments.
What are history students most interested in?
Debating societies and student-led reading groups align closely with history programmes, giving students repeated opportunities to evaluate sources, defend interpretations, and receive peer challenge. Conferences and research colloquia extend this, exposing students to current scholarship and providing low-stakes platforms to present work. Because placements and fieldwork feature less in history than in other disciplines, societies and volunteering often become the practical outlet where students apply methods, curate exhibitions, or deliver public-history talks that link archival study to audiences.
How do activities affect academic success?
Students who participate frequently report better study discipline and more confident argumentation. Activities that mirror assessment formats—such as short, timed debates or poster sessions—help students internalise marking criteria and reduce uncertainty about expectations. Staff who advise societies can use these settings to clarify how to scope reading, structure essays, and make evidence-led claims, which improves performance without adding formal workload.
What do societies and clubs contribute?
Societies provide applied learning through museum visits, site trips and guest speakers, which deepen understanding and connect modules to practice. They also create networks across year groups, so first-year students pick up study strategies early and finalists access near-peer advice on dissertations and careers. Events that showcase historians from different sectors—heritage, civil service, policy, media—translate subject capabilities into labour-market language, bolstering confidence in progression.
What barriers limit participation?
Access and friction often decide whether students take part. Costs, travel, and timing deter those who commute, work alongside study, or have caring responsibilities. Mature, part-time and some Black student cohorts voice more reservations about whether offers feel for them, so targeted outreach and co-design with these groups matter. A single calendar, simple sign-up, hybrid access where possible, micro-opportunities that do not demand long blocks, and modest subsidies help convert intent into attendance.
How does the Students’ Union enable participation?
Students’ Unions act as convenors, funding and accrediting societies while removing administrative burden from academic staff. The strongest unions co-design activity with student reps from under-participating groups, publish short “what to expect” event summaries, and align offers to timetabling rhythms. Quick pulse feedback and participation tracking help societies iterate formats and timings, sustaining inclusion across the year.
What trends and actions should universities prioritise?
Two moves deliver most value for history cohorts. First, connect activity to assessment literacy: publish plain-English marking guides, use society sessions for annotated exemplars, and run debate- or pitch-style events that rehearse argument structures. Second, widen access by design: schedule evening and lunchtime options, offer hybrid and drop-in formats, minimise fees, and signpost childcare-friendly choices. Where disruption from industrial action or legacy pandemic effects persists, use societies to provide catch-up skills sessions and Q&As that make changes and expectations explicit. Cross-society collaboration with politics, languages, and media groups adds perspective and audience, enriching the historical lens.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics aggregates and analyses open-text feedback so teams can target action where it moves sentiment most. For extra-curricular activity, you can segment tone by age, mode, domicile and subject, spot access gaps, and evidence change over time. For history, you can monitor assessment-related themes alongside student life comments, then brief programme and Students’ Union partners with concise, export-ready summaries. Drill from institution to school and programme, compare like-for-like against sector peers, and use quick pulses to iterate extracurricular offers across the year.
Request a walkthrough
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
© Student Voice Systems Limited, All rights reserved.