Do better learning resources improve outcomes for economics students?

learning resourceseconomics

Yes. When provision is accessible and tuned to assessment and delivery, economics students learn more effectively and report stronger experiences. In the National Student Survey (NSS, the UK-wide final‑year survey), learning resources attract a consistently positive tone (index +33.6), but disabled students’ experience (+28.1) trails non‑disabled peers (+35.5) by −7.4 points, so inclusivity must be built in. In the subject landscape shaped by economics, student comment volume concentrates on assessment, with Feedback taking 9.8% of the conversation. These sector signals steer this case study: protect breadth and access, and make resources work hardest where assessment expectations and delivery quality need the most support.

How should institutions evaluate and deploy learning resources for economics students?

Economics students need targeted, accessible resources that directly support understanding and outcomes. Start by evaluating the resources students actually use, drawing on text analysis of NSS open‑text comments and local surveys so student voice shapes provision. Prioritise tools that demystify complex models and methods—multimedia explainers, interactive simulations, and worked examples aligned to assessment briefs—so students see how learning connects to what is assessed.

By involving students in identifying what helps, teams align reading lists, platforms and tools with need. This analytical approach highlights strengths and gaps in current provision and guides substantive enhancements to support learning across modules.

How does extensive economics literature support learning?

Breadth matters when it enables critical comparison of theories and debates. Curated reading lists, synthesised summaries and context notes help students navigate volume and complexity, especially early in a programme. Programmes that review student feedback each term can refine coverage and sequencing so literature supports the intended learning outcomes and assessment tasks rather than overwhelming students.

How do digital resources enable self‑paced learning and revision?

E‑books, online articles and interactive activities support flexible study and repeated exposure to demanding material. Embedding quizzes, flashcards and short applied tasks sustains engagement while reinforcing threshold concepts. Teams should analyse how students use these tools and whether they map to assessment criteria, then adjust design and signposting to strengthen revision and autonomy.

How do resources deepen research and exploration?

Access to economic databases, journals and credible datasets underpins strong argumentation and methodological confidence. Subscriptions and discovery routes should be visible in module sites, with targeted guidance on search strategies and data handling. Virtual economics conferences and seminars add live perspectives and motivate deeper dives, provided links back to module outcomes and assessment briefs are explicit.

How do resources foster practical engagement and active learning?

Case studies, simulations and problem‑based exercises translate theory into application. Use session templates that foreground learning aims, a worked example and “how this will be assessed,” then close with a concise “what to do next.” Feedback from these activities offers rich signals on comprehension; analysing this commentary helps staff tune pacing, scaffolding and the link to marking criteria.

How do resources improve support and accessibility?

Accessible design is a baseline, not a bolt‑on. Provide alternative formats by default, ensure compatibility with assistive technologies, and keep navigation simple and consistent across platforms. Clear signposting to help, tool support and off‑campus access reduces friction for commuter, international and disabled students and helps to close the accessibility gap identified in student feedback.

What challenges persist with current resources?

Technical glitches, clunky off‑campus access and inconsistent availability of advanced texts interrupt learning. Pre‑recorded materials without opportunities to clarify understanding limit progress. Address these by stabilising the tech stack, auditing access pathways, aligning resources to assessment briefs, and creating visible ownership for fixes with regular updates to students. Where remote elements remain, prioritise interaction and clarity of structure to sustain engagement.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

• Map student comment volume and tone on learning resources over time, from institution to programme and cohort, so you can target fixes that matter.
• Segment by mode, age and disability to spot and close accessibility gaps; track resolution of issues to demonstrate progress.
• Compare Economics with like‑for‑like CAH peers to see whether delivery and assessment support are improving in the right places.
• Produce export‑ready summaries for programme teams showing where resources aid assessment clarity, where access creates friction, and which quick wins will lift outcomes and NSS scores.

Request a walkthrough

Book a Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

• All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
• Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
• Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.

Book a demo Prefer email? [email protected]

More posts on learning resources:

• Do marketing students have the learning resources they need?
• Are biomedical sciences students getting the learning resources they need?
• What do sport and exercise sciences students need from learning resources?
• What learning resources do business management students say they need most?

More posts on economics student views:

• Do study spaces shape economics students' learning?
• Do economics students feel they have enough module choice and variety?
• What matters most to economics students’ university experience?
• How do economics students rate their university libraries?