Do business studies students benefit from structured opportunities to work with peers?

By Student Voice Analytics
opportunities to work with other studentsbusiness studies

Yes, when collaboration is designed into timetables and supported with accountability, business studies students report better learning and fairer outcomes. The National Student Survey (NSS) topic Opportunities to work with other students reflects how students experience peer collaboration across UK higher education; its tone sits near neutral overall at 46.3% Positive, 49.3% Negative and 4.4% Neutral. Within Business Studies, collaboration features more often in feedback (3.6% share of comments) and skews negative (sentiment index −8.8), so programmes that design-in group work and scaffold it well reduce friction around logistics and fairness. This analysis frames the narrative below and focuses on the practical implications for course design, support and assessment.

We look into the experiences and opinions of business studies students, focusing on interactions and collaborations with fellow students. We consider the balance between group and individual work, and how staff provide support to facilitate these opportunities. Using text analysis and student surveys, we present how collaborative opportunities are perceived, approached and valued, and where institutions can better serve their students.

Is group work a double-edged sword for business students?

Group work builds authentic teamwork and communication, mirroring real business settings, but students often report uneven participation and fairness concerns. When courses state roles, norms and milestones up front, the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Staff increase positive experiences by providing explicit group guidelines, pre-provisioned tools for communication and file-sharing, and calibrated peer assessment to discourage free riding. Because time and access shape experience, cohorts with mixed availability need structured collaboration windows and agreed escalation routes when problems arise.

How should courses balance group and individual work?

A balanced pattern of assessed teamwork and individual tasks develops both collaborative and independent capability. Programme teams that timetable collaboration as default practice (kick-off, mid-point review, showcase) and provide asynchronous routes for those with atypical schedules sustain engagement without sacrificing standards. The move to blended delivery makes this design work more pressing: publish milestones, make roles visible, and provide templates so groups can start quickly and stay on track.

How does collaboration enhance learning in business studies?

Peer work enriches learning by exposing students to diverse perspectives, improving decision-making and problem-solving. It also develops communication and leadership, attributes employers value. Students describe stronger motivation and belonging when they work in structured teams, which supports progression and wellbeing. Staff who normalise collaboration through seminars, projects and sprints see deeper engagement and better preparation for placement and early career roles.

What support systems make collaboration work?

Institutions strengthen group work when they provide pre-created digital spaces per team, accessible resources and hybrid-ready rooms. Tutors should set expectations, run short check-ins, and offer formative feedback at milestones. Light-touch peer contribution checks increase accountability without creating heavy process. Inclusive practice matters: captions, readable documents and clear joining instructions reduce barriers for disabled, mature and part-time learners and improve the experience for the whole cohort.

How can we assess group work fairly?

Fairness improves when assessments combine a shared deliverable with individual components, and when marking criteria, exemplars and grade descriptors are explicit. Short group contracts, interim submissions and peer moderation make contribution visible. In Business Studies, students place high weight on transparency around expectations and standards, so mapping outcomes to marking criteria and setting a service level for feedback reduces anxiety and stabilises sentiment about group projects.

How does peer work shape the wider university experience?

Collaboration extends beyond classrooms, building peer relationships that support confidence and academic resilience. Mixed-background teams mirror the global nature of business, encouraging inclusive dialogue and cultural awareness. Staff who curate spaces for cross-cohort study groups and co-curricular projects help students form networks that sustain them through assessments and into placement or graduate roles.

What do students say would fix the pain points?

Students consistently ask for earlier group formation, clear roles, regular progress checkpoints and accessible tools. They want quick ways to surface issues without penalty and timely decisions when teams need adjustment. Borrowing patterns from subjects with strong collaborative traditions (studios, labs, crits, project sprints) and adapting them to business modules tends to lift engagement and reduce coordination costs. A small set of consistent practices, applied across modules, usually outperforms ad hoc arrangements.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

Student Voice Analytics shows how collaboration lands with your students over time and where tone diverges by cohort, mode, campus or demographic. It benchmarks Business Studies against peer subjects and the wider sector, highlights friction for mature and part-time learners, and produces concise briefings and exports for programme teams, boards and quality reviews. Providers use it to target design changes that make collaboration easy to access, accountable and inclusive, then evidence improvement in subsequent NSS cycles.

Request a walkthrough

Book a Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

  • All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
  • Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
  • Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.

More posts on opportunities to work with other students:

More posts on business studies student views: