Do art students get the contact time they need?
Published Mar 28, 2024 · Updated Oct 12, 2025
contact timeartNot consistently. Across the National Student Survey (NSS) open‑text analysis of contact time, student sentiment is negative overall (index −26.8), though art is less negative than many disciplines at −18.1. As a cross‑sector lens, this category captures how students experience the amount, reliability and accessibility of taught time; the art subject grouping, used across UK higher education to benchmark disciplines, shows students prize studio dialogue and hands‑on guidance but feel the benefit erode when timetabling slips or access is constrained. The sections below translate those insights into practical priorities for art programmes.
Starting art students in the UK's higher education sector embark on a learning journey filled with exploration and discovery. Across this journey, contact time between students and staff shapes understanding, skill development, and artistic inspiration. Analysing student surveys and open‑text comments helps staff tailor strategies that make each hour count, ensuring students feel supported and inspired.
Does quality of contact time matter more than quantity for art students?
Yes. Art students often ask for more hands‑on time, but they emphasise the quality and usefulness of each session over simply adding hours. Given the negative tone around contact time across the sector (index −26.8) and a still‑negative picture for arts (−18.1), programmes should focus on designing critiques, workshops and one‑to‑one supervision that deliver substantive formative guidance. Treat the timetable as a promise: minimise short‑notice changes, schedule replacements promptly, and make a simple change log visible. This approach prioritises meaningful interaction, nurtures technique and voice, and builds a sense of belonging in studio communities.
How should course duration and structure shape contact time?
Structure drives satisfaction. A 15‑month programme intensifies immersion and self‑direction, while a 2‑year course enables deeper exploration but must balance part‑time work and studio access. Student feedback shows a preference for flexible structures with predictable staff access alongside protected independent practice. Final‑year expectations rise sharply, so programmes should schedule regular, purposeful feedback points linked to assessment briefs and publish clear staff availability to reduce uncertainty.
What do art students need from online contact?
Consistency and responsiveness. When teaching moves online, students judge quality by timely communication, scheduled tutor availability, and accessible alternatives if live sessions cannot run. In art, where studio practice matters, blend targeted online critiques with rapid turnaround for questions and bookable virtual drop‑ins. Where timetabling is the friction (art comments rate Scheduling/timetabling at −20.2), offer repeat sessions or recordings within the week and state service levels for re‑arranged contact.
How do staff interactions build a creative community?
Regular, constructive dialogue builds confidence and momentum. Mentors, tutors and technicians provide critique, encouragement and challenge that underpin personal voice. Programmes that schedule iterative feedback, share exemplars tied to marking criteria, and integrate peer‑to‑peer critique cultivate a learning community where students take risks and progress their practice.
How can programmes make tutor time predictable and accessible?
Predictability reduces anxiety and wasted effort. Standardise office hours in calendars, publish module‑level contact expectations, and avoid changes inside a “no‑surprises” window wherever workable. When clashes or cancellations occur, provide accessible alternatives within a defined time frame. Disabled students frequently report more barriers to accessing contact, so prioritise adjustments and flexible formats to close that experience gap.
Why do facilities amplify the value of contact time?
Facilities shape how far contact time translates into progress. In art comments, General facilities account for 13.4% of all feedback and remain a prominent strength, reflecting how studios, workshops and materials enable staff guidance to land in practice. Technicians and tutors maximise impact when equipment is available, booking rules are transparent, and fault reporting is fast with visible updates. Well‑run spaces turn feedback into making.
What counts as value for money in art?
Students link value directly to reliable, high‑quality contact and access to facilities, particularly when fees reach up to £9,000. In art feedback, Costs/Value for money is strongly negative (−53.5) when contact is cancelled at short notice, space is hard to access, or feedback loops are slow. Being explicit about what is included, when and how students will receive contact, and how to escalate issues helps align expectations with delivery.
What lasting effects did COVID-19 have on contact time?
The pandemic normalised hybrid contact, but it also exposed the limits of remote studio learning. Where programmes retained flexible options while restoring in‑person critique and access to materials, students adapted. The lesson that endures: keep digital as a supplement to hands‑on learning, with timely online access when live teaching cannot be guaranteed.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics surfaces where contact time falls short and where it works. You can track category‑level sentiment over time, compare art with like‑for‑like subjects, and segment by cohort or mode to target timetable reliability, access and communications. The platform produces concise, anonymised summaries for programme and timetabling teams, helping you publish delivered‑versus‑planned contact, standardise staff availability, and evidence improvements in student experience.
Request a walkthrough
Book a free Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and reporting designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready reporting.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
UK-hosted · No public LLM APIs · Same-day turnaround
More posts on contact time:
- Are history students satisfied with contact time?
- Are human geography students getting enough contact time?
- How can psychology programmes enhance students’ contact time?
- Is contact time working for adult nursing students?