Are UK engineering students satisfied with how their courses are organised and managed?
Partly. Across the NSS (National Student Survey) open-text for organisation and management of course, sentiment leans negative sector‑wide, with 52.2% negative. Younger cohorts drive this pattern: 70.0% of comments come from young students and their sentiment index is −7.2. Within the engineering (non-specific) subject family used in the sector’s Common Aggregation Hierarchy, operational rhythm reads steadier: only 5.2% of engineering comments focus on organisation and management and these tend to be positive, but assessment clarity continues to depress experience, with marking criteria sentiment at −42.8. This context frames the mixed picture in engineering: timetabling and basic comms usually hold, yet opaque assessment guidance and workload design undermine satisfaction.
As we look into the organisation and management of these courses, student voice remains central. Direct feedback, gathered through student surveys and text analysis, shapes course enhancements that meet learner needs. Students often prioritise coherent course structures and communication from staff. These elements influence not only learning effectiveness but also satisfaction and engagement. We explore strengths and challenges in engineering programmes, offering actionable insights to improve the educational experience and outcomes.
What works well in the organisation and management of engineering programmes?
Students consistently praise structured programmes that help them navigate studies efficiently. Well‑sequenced, relevant content aligns with academic and professional goals, and prepared, knowledgeable staff enhance learning. Comprehensive online resources support study beyond the classroom and allow flexible pacing for students juggling responsibilities. Interaction with diverse international peers broadens perspectives and supports understanding of global engineering challenges. Where course structure and administration function effectively, outcomes and experiences trend strongly.
Where do students encounter organisational friction?
Communication gaps between academic teams and administration reduce the sense of connection, particularly where students expect face‑to‑face engagement in practical modules. Ambiguity in assessment briefs, rubrics and exemplars creates confusion and variability in performance. Heavy workloads and rigid scheduling limit students’ ability to balance study with other commitments. These factors combine to create barriers to effective learning. Addressing them improves day‑to‑day experience and attainment.
What organisational issues surface in online delivery and platforms?
Students report technical glitches, fragmented tools and limited interactivity. Engineering needs hands‑on learning; platforms that fail to support labs and tutorials constrain understanding. Staff also face inconsistent infrastructure and maintenance demands. While many providers have strengthened remote provision, students expect better-organised online spaces, reliable access to materials and sessions, and timely support to maintain engagement.
How should feedback and guidance operate to support organised learning?
Students need timely, developmental feedback that shows how to improve against assessment briefs and marking criteria. One‑to‑one guidance opportunities help address specific questions and build confidence. Institutions should equip staff to provide consistent, actionable feedback and maintain a single source of truth for assessment information, with exemplars and calibrated marking to reduce uncertainty.
What improvements do students propose?
- Provide predictable rhythms: a single source of truth for comms, with named operational ownership and rapid triage of issues.
- Publish timetables earlier, flag changes with a brief rationale, and minimise late alterations, especially on high‑enrolment modules.
- Balance workloads and sequencing across modules so deadlines are staggered and manageable.
- Ensure assessment materials include transparent criteria, annotated exemplars and realistic feedback service levels.
- Improve accessibility of course operations through mobile‑friendly schedules, alternative arrangements and clear routes for adjustments.
How can teams implement changes and overcome barriers?
Start with comms: regular briefings and a transparent “what changed and why” update reduce confusion. Track timetable stability and a minimum notice period, prioritising modules with larger cohorts. Spread assessment deadlines and provide planners students can use alongside programme calendars. Strengthen digital infrastructure for practical modules, using platforms that support interactive labs and tutorials. Review progress monthly with student representatives and publish actions, closing the loop on feedback.
What should providers prioritise now?
Tighten the coherence and clarity of course communication, align assessment design and feedback with marking criteria, and reduce operational friction in timetabling and online delivery. These steps address the points that most disrupt engineering students’ experience and, based on sector evidence, shift sentiment in the right direction for the cohorts most affected.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics surfaces the organisation and management theme alongside engineering subject insights in one place. You can:
- See sentiment over time and by segment (age, mode, disability, CAH subject group), and drill from provider to school/department and cohort.
- Compare like for like across programmes to spot where operations diverge for engineering cohorts.
- Generate concise anonymised summaries for programme, timetabling, exams and student comms teams, and export ready‑to‑share briefings.
- Track operational metrics (response times, change lead time, timetable stability) and publish actions so students see progress.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on organisation, management of course:
- What do civil engineering students say about course organisation?
- Is course management working for biomedical sciences students?
- How do law students rate course organisation and management?
- Are medicine students satisfied with course organisation and management?