Are veterinary and dentistry courses organised well for students?
Published Jun 16, 2024 · Updated Oct 12, 2025
organisation, management of courseveterinary medicine and dentistryMostly not yet: across the National Student Survey (NSS), students’ comments on the organisation, management of course theme skew negative (52.2% negative vs 43.6% positive). In veterinary medicine and dentistry, overall sentiment is stronger (57.0% positive; 40.3% negative) because teaching and community rate highly, but scheduling remains the weak link (−44.5). The theme captures how UK providers run timetabling, communications and operational delivery day to day, while this discipline group spans clinically intensive programmes with substantial practical training; together they point to the same fixes: predictable timetables, a single source of truth, and visible ownership of decisions.
How should course intensity and workload be managed? The rigorous nature of veterinary medicine and dentistry demands dense curricula and extensive practical training. Course teams should shape timetables that distribute assessments and clinical blocks across the term, build in recovery and reflection, and protect wellbeing alongside competence. Publish schedules early with a defined change window so students can plan placements, labs and personal commitments. Set expectations at induction with assessment calendars, placement windows and named operational owners. Continually review pacing against learning objectives and cohort capacity, and give students the planning information they need to balance skills labs, fieldwork and study.
Do clinical placements and hands-on experience deliver consistent value? Students judge placements on access to relevant cases, time on task and support from supervisors. Strong partnerships with providers, transparent allocation rules and timely confirmations reduce disruption and uneven experiences. Use short pulse surveys during placements, act on issues quickly, and share changes with the cohort so students see the loop closed. Treat placement management as a core operational function: align calendars with taught modules, publish travel and rota expectations early, and provide a single point of contact for problems.
Is the curriculum structured and integrated for clinical readiness? Programmes perform best when theoretical science flows into skills practice and clinical exposure without duplication or gaps. Map modules to competencies, sequence content to support progressive clinical judgement, and streamline where overlap adds workload without learning gain. Use student feedback and assessment outcomes to identify friction points, then adjust module order, contact time or assessment briefs to keep the path to competence coherent.
Are assessment and feedback aligned with professional competencies? Students respond well to assessment that mirrors clinical decision-making and skills acquisition. Align each task to programme outcomes, and make criteria transparent with checklist-style rubrics and short annotated exemplars. Set a realistic service level for feedback turnaround, and ensure comments point to specific next steps. When students report delays or opaque marking, publish actions and timelines so they can see improvements in practice.
Do support systems and resources meet the demands of intensive programmes? Reliable access to academic advice, mental health support and peer networks stabilises cohorts during high-intensity periods. Provide accessible schedules and resources, clear routes for adjustments, and proactive signposting. Libraries, simulation labs and online materials should match the cadence of clinical blocks and assessments so students can prepare and consolidate effectively.
Does management and communication enable students to plan with confidence? Operational rhythm shapes the experience. Students ask for a single source of truth for timetabling and changes, rapid triage of queries, and clarity about who owns decisions. Weekly “what changed and why” notes, visible change controls, and standardised handbooks reduce noise. Track response times and time-to-resolution for student queries, lead time on timetable changes, and themes in the backlog, then publish actions so cohorts see progress.
What should providers prioritise next, according to students? Prioritise timetabling stability and transparent change control; these improvements address the most negative operational experiences and support learning in clinical contexts. Next, make assessment purposes and standards explicit and feedback timely. Expand adaptive and optional elements where feasible to accommodate different pacing needs, and retain the strong teaching and community culture students value by sharing effective practice across modules and teams.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you Student Voice Analytics surfaces where course organisation falters and where it works. It tracks the organisation and management theme over time and by cohort, mode and discipline, so you can focus on timetabling stability, communications and scheduling. You can drill from provider to programme, generate concise anonymised summaries for academic and operations teams, and compare like-for-like across veterinary medicine and dentistry and related subject areas. Export-ready briefings make it straightforward to share actions with timetabling, placement and student comms teams, and to evidence “you said, we did” in NSS cycles.
Request a walkthrough
Book a free Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and reporting designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready reporting.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
UK-hosted · No public LLM APIs · Same-day turnaround
More posts on organisation, management of course:
- How well organised are music courses for students?
- Are organisation and management issues holding back marketing students?
- Are accounting students satisfied with course organisation and management?
- How can geography teams improve course organisation?