What are tourism students saying about teaching staff?
Updated Mar 03, 2026
teaching stafftourism, transport and travelStudents in tourism, transport and travel are generally positive about teaching staff, but satisfaction can drop quickly when delivery feels unpredictable or communication is unclear. Across the sector, 78.3% of National Student Survey (NSS) comments about teaching staff are positive (sentiment index +52.8, see the student feedback analysis glossary for definitions), and in this discipline teaching staff is the most discussed topic (10.6% of comments; net positive index +31.3), while remote learning remains a weak spot at −31.2.
Why do student perceptions of teaching staff matter in tourism, transport and travel?
Understanding how students experience academic staff is a first step in improving teaching and learning. This overview highlights where perceptions differ and prioritises the changes most likely to lift student satisfaction. It draws on student surveys, the NSS open-text analysis methodology, and ongoing student voice work. Used well, these insights help you refine day-to-day interactions and focus improvement on the practices that shape learning. Staff knowledge matters, but students’ experience of delivery, organisation and communication determines whether that expertise translates into outcomes.
Why does subject expertise matter?
In these fields, students value staff who combine a strong grasp of theory with current industry practice. When lecturers connect concepts to real-world scenarios, students report higher engagement and clearer relevance, which supports career preparedness. Expertise is not static; continuous professional development and adaptation to sector changes underpin programme quality and student outcomes.
Does passion and enthusiasm in teaching change outcomes?
Yes. Students consistently link enthusiastic delivery to higher motivation and deeper engagement. Energetic teaching makes complex topics more accessible and supports retention. In trend-driven subject areas, knowledge without an engaging approach rarely sustains attention.
How do communication and clarity shape learning?
Clear communication underpins comprehension and attainment. Students highlight the need for precise explanations, structured sessions and unambiguous assessment briefs, especially where terminology or operational content is dense. In online settings, the absence of visuals and clear signposting can quickly impede understanding. Standardise core materials, provide a weekly “what to expect” update and use worked exemplars so students can act on guidance quickly.
Why do timeliness and organisational skills matter in these programmes?
Field trips, guest lectures and placement activity create complex timetabling. When staff keep schedules predictable and meet feedback turnaround standards, students engage more fully with both theoretical and applied components. Missed deadlines, unclear instructions and last-minute changes undermine confidence and increase anxiety. A single source of truth for timetables, plus named ownership of course communications, stabilises delivery, and supports better organisation and management in tourism, transport and travel courses.
What does effective support and accessibility look like?
Approachable staff and responsive personal tutoring foster belonging and progress (see what support matters most in tourism, transport and travel programmes for related insights). Predictable office hours, timely responses and opportunities to clarify questions outside scheduled teaching signal care and help students keep momentum. For commuter and part-time cohorts, provide the same support through out-of-hours slots and asynchronous summaries to ensure equitable access.
How should technology and resources be used?
Technology lifts applied learning when inclusive by design. Virtual simulations and digital resources extend exposure to industry practice, but remote learning underperforms when interaction is thin or materials are inaccessible. Record sessions with captions, structure discussion, keep materials lightweight and mobile-friendly, and provide alternatives for students with limited connectivity so technology enhances rather than hinders learning.
What should programme teams do next?
Prioritise the human fundamentals students value: visible expertise, availability and encouragement. Stabilise delivery by tightening timetabling and communication routines so students know what is happening and why. Make assessment expectations unmissable with annotated exemplars, checklist-style marking criteria and predictable turnaround. Sustain placements and fieldwork with clear briefs, active supervision and on-site feedback. These moves preserve the strong tone around staff while addressing the delivery and communication issues that depress sentiment.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics provides continuous visibility of comments and sentiment on teaching staff and delivery in tourism, transport and travel. It benchmarks your programmes against the wider sector and cognate groups, with drill-downs from provider to subject family, department, programme and cohort. Segment by mode, site and year, track delivery pain points such as remote learning, scheduling and feedback, and generate concise, anonymised briefings and export-ready tables for programme reviews and quality boards.
Request a walkthrough
Book a free Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and reporting designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready reporting.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
UK-hosted · No public LLM APIs · Same-day turnaround
Related Entries
- Do placements and fieldwork improve tourism studies?
- Are tourism, transport and travel courses organised well for students?
- What do tourism, transport and travel students want from course content?
- What support matters most in tourism, transport and travel programmes?
- NSS open-text analysis methodology for UK HE
- Student feedback analysis glossary for UK HE