What do business studies students want from module choice?
Students want breadth they can actually take: early, transparent option lists with fair allocation and accessible timetables, plus assessment expectations they can trust. Across UK National Student Survey (NSS) open‑text comments tagged to module choice and variety in 2018–2025, sentiment skews positive (64.6% Positive, 31.8% Negative; index +27.8). In Business Studies, which is the subject grouping used for sector‑wide comparison, tone is more mixed (53.6% Positive, 42.1% Negative), so optionality and clarity need closer attention in business schools. The analysis below uses those sector patterns to shape practical changes to programme design and delivery.
How diverse should the module diet be?
Students value a broad menu when it is well signposted and practically accessible. Concerns centre on compulsory modules crowding out choice and on clashes or caps that make optionality hard to realise. Publish the full module diet early with prerequisites, caps and known clashes, label high‑demand options, and provide viable fallbacks. Run capacity and clash checks before enrolment opens and aim for no‑clash timetables for common option pairs. Use transparent, fair allocation with visible waiting lists and time‑stamped queues. Offer flexible slots or online variants where feasible, especially for mature and part‑time learners. Provide a short switching window after teaching starts with academic advice embedded. Track equity by cohort and subject and close the loop by publishing what changed and why after allocation cycles.
Which assessment mix supports engagement and preparedness?
Students ask for a balanced assessment mix and, above all, for transparency. Traditional exams and essays still dominate, but authentic tasks such as presentations, portfolios and simulations support workplace readiness. Business studies comments consistently point to the value of unambiguous assessment briefs and standards. Provide annotated exemplars, checklist‑style marking criteria and pre‑briefs that map learning outcomes to criteria. Set a credible feedback turnaround standard and ensure consistency across modules so students understand expectations and how to improve.
What support structures sustain choice and progression?
Timely, targeted support helps students navigate choice and succeed in challenging modules. Retain visible contact points (module leaders, tutors, advisers) and a simple route for queries. Offer tutorials and workshops tailored to known pressure points in the module diet. Use a single source of truth for course communications, a light‑touch weekly change log, and a named owner for timetabling. Align academic advising with the switching window so changes remain pedagogically sound as well as administratively feasible.
How do we make module choice inclusive of disabled students?
Accessibility must be designed in from the start. Provide core materials in alternative formats compatible with assistive technologies, and plan flexible timelines where required. Train staff to anticipate adjustments within assessment design and delivery rather than retrofit them. Avoid single‑slot bottlenecks by offering repeated or online sessions for popular options. Work closely with disability support services and use text analytics on feedback to identify gaps and iterate quickly.
How do we balance content and workload across options?
A coherent workload model underpins satisfaction. Map assessments and learning activities to credit consistently across modules, publish assessment calendars and estimated weekly workload, and phase deadlines to avoid spikes. Release reading lists and assessment briefs early so students can plan. Where curricula escalate in complexity year on year, ensure the depth of teaching and learning resources keeps pace with workload expectations.
How should theory connect to practice in business studies?
Students want to apply theory to real contexts. Integrate live projects, internships and simulation exercises within modules to sharpen analysis and decision‑making. Group work often generates friction, so set short group contracts, interim milestones and calibrated peer assessment where appropriate. Collaboration with industry partners to embed real business challenges can lift perceived relevance without overloading assessment.
What should business schools change next?
Act on what students say: publish options early with realistic capacity and no‑clash design, allocate fairly, embed a short switching window, and couple choice with robust advising. Standardise assessment transparency and feedback practices across modules. Prioritise inclusive delivery and flexible scheduling so choice is meaningful for all cohorts. These steps align with sector patterns and address the specific pressure points reported by business studies students.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
- Surfaces topic and sentiment over time for module choice and variety, with drill‑downs from provider to school or department and cohort.
- Provides like‑for‑like comparisons across subject groupings and demographics, so you can evidence improvement against the right peer set.
- Flags cohorts at risk and subject clusters with persistent constraints, helping you target capacity, timetabling and allocation fixes.
- Produces concise, export‑ready summaries and tables for programme boards, curriculum review and timetabling or resource planning meetings.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on module choice and variety:
- Do economics students feel they have enough module choice and variety?
- Do adult nursing students want more module choice?
- Does module choice shape history students' engagement and success?
- Do philosophy students feel they have enough module choice and variety?