How can student voice improve Business and Management programmes?
By Student Voice Analytics
student voicebusiness and management (non-specific)By closing the loop on feedback, clarifying assessment, and removing access barriers, Business and Management teams turn student voice into demonstrable change. In the National Student Survey (NSS), the student voice category records 43.4% Positive and 54.2% Negative comments, signalling that many students do not see action, with part-time peers particularly negative (−21.8). Within business and management (non-specific), feedback dominates discussion at 10.6% of comments, while sentiment around marking criteria is strongly negative (−46.5). These signals set practical priorities for programme leaders: publish visible “you said, we did” updates, use annotated exemplars and checklist‑style rubrics, and provide hybrid, accessible channels so diverse cohorts can contribute and see follow‑through.
What’s the evidence and why does it matter now?
In UK higher education, integrating student voice shapes learning and outcomes in Business and Management. Staff gather feedback through surveys, focus groups and text analytics, then act on it through visible changes to teaching, assessment and operations. Regular, low‑friction opportunities to contribute and timely updates build trust and lead to programme‑level adjustments students can see.
What does student voice mean in Business and Management?
Student voice is active partnership in shaping learning and the wider programme experience. When institutions simplify mechanisms and act on insights, engagement and satisfaction rise. Prioritise inclusive routes for part‑time, mature and disabled students, who often face barriers to contributing or seeing follow‑through. Provide varied input modes (written, anonymous, live), accessible materials in advance, and consistent feedback to cohorts about actions taken.
How should feedback work to drive course improvement?
Students respond when feedback prompts tangible change in module content, delivery and assessment. In Business and Management, feedback is the most discussed theme and students want clarity on what “good” looks like. Translate comments into action by publishing turnaround standards, calibrating markers, and using annotated exemplars and checklist rubrics aligned to the assessment brief and marking criteria. Report back to cohorts on what changed and why.
Where do communication breakdowns occur and how do we fix them?
Delays and opaque processes erode trust. Establish a single source of truth for programme updates, predictable communication rhythms, and named owners for actions. Offer hybrid or recorded staff–student forums, asynchronous input options, and out‑of‑hours office hours for representatives. Commit to a response service‑level agreement for student feedback and track on‑time responses. Regularly share “you said, we did” summaries so students can see progress.
How do we rebalance power between students and staff?
Position students as collaborators in curriculum and assessment design. Involve elected representatives in curriculum committees with visible action logs, owners and due dates. Co‑develop assessment briefs and marking criteria with students to reduce misunderstanding and increase fairness. This approach improves relationships, supports academic integrity, and makes decisions more transparent.
How should we support mental health alongside academic demands?
Wellbeing underpins learning. Normalise discussion of mental health within the programme, provide easy access to on‑campus and online support, and signpost services routinely. Equip staff to recognise distress and refer students to appropriate support. Embed manageable workloads and predictable timetabling to reduce avoidable stress.
What turns feedback into tangible course improvement?
Collect targeted feedback, act on it quickly, and evaluate impact. Use follow‑up checks to see whether changes improved learning, and iterate where needed. Monitor sentiment each term for priority groups and track the positive:negative ratio to evidence improvement. Share outcomes with students and staff, closing the loop at module and programme level.
How should the complaints procedure work for students?
Students should find a simple, timely and transparent process with a named case owner. Provide a clear step‑by‑step guide, an online tracker for status updates, and accessible contact points for advice. Use data from complaints to inform programme quality assurance, and publish anonymised learning points back to students and staff.
What changes make the biggest difference now?
- Clarify assessment with exemplars, calibrated marking and timely, actionable feedback.
- Make voice channels inclusive and accessible, and commit to response timelines.
- Use visible “you said, we did” reporting to evidence action.
- Monitor sentiment by cohort and group, then target interventions where tone trends negative.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics turns open‑text into shared priorities for Business and Management. It tracks topics and sentiment over time from provider to programme, benchmarks like‑for‑like across CAH subject groups and demographics, and produces concise, anonymised summaries for boards and programme teams. The platform flags when tone shifts for specific groups so leaders can intervene early and evidence impact with export‑ready outputs.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
-
All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
-
Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
-
Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on student voice:
More posts on business and management (non-specific) student views: