Do universities support design students effectively?

By Student Voice Analytics
student supportdesign studies

Yes. Across the National Student Survey (NSS), comments tagged to student support are largely positive at 68.6% Positive. In the discipline lens for design studies, overall mood is 55.9% Positive, signalling strong relationships and facilities alongside operational friction. As a sector lens, student support frames how universities resource academic, technical and wellbeing services; as a discipline lens, design studies shows how those services land in design studios. These patterns shape the priorities below.

Design students face a range of challenges unique to their discipline. Universities increasingly analyse student insights to enhance support services. Surveys and text analysis help providers listen to the student voice and align services to need. This engagement improves academic and personal support, helping teams target resources. By analysing real feedback, institutions adapt the environment essential for the creative and demanding nature of design studies.

How should academic and disability support be configured for design students?

Close gaps experienced by disabled students whose sentiment on support trends lower (index 28.0) than non-disabled peers (35.1). Provide rapid triage, named case ownership, accessible communications and proactive follow‑ups until resolution. For design cohorts engaged in complex visual and practical tasks, learning support, dyslexia and disability services need to be versatile and integrated with studio-based practice. Providers should routinely review adjustments for studio access, technical demonstrations and assessment, so that academic support and disability provision are joined up around the creative process.

Do facilities and IT access enable creative work?

Facilities strongly shape experience in design. Student feedback signals a positive tone for general facilities, but more contested IT access and reliability (−10.4). Universities should keep software and equipment current, ensure booking transparency, and maintain a live facilities and IT status page with ownership and uptime targets. Reliable studios, timely maintenance and responsive technical support underpin experimentation and the quality of project outcomes. Inclusive tools and spaces, co-designed with students, help more learners participate fully.

How should staff communicate and provide feedback to sustain progress?

Operational delivery often frustrates design cohorts when timetables change or information fragments. Establish a single source of truth for timetabling and changes, add a short weekly digest, and use light change-free windows around assessment peaks. Feedback quality trends nearer to neutral in design compared with the sector, but students still ask for transparent marking criteria and timely, developmental comments. Use concise rubrics, annotated exemplars and routine marker calibration, and set realistic turnaround service levels. Student surveys provide the quickest route to monitor whether communication and feedback practices are landing as intended.

What builds a supportive design community?

People-centred support is a strength in design. Students value accessible tutors, personal development opportunities and peer collaboration. Departments should protect time for studio presence and informal contact, and align central services so referrals feel seamless. These communities aid immediate academic progress and build professional networks for life after graduation. Keep responses human and visible, and show follow-through so students see their concerns resolved.

How did COVID-19 reshape access to support?

Pandemic-era shifts to online and blended models changed how design students accessed studios, critiques and support. Remote critiques and technical teaching proved harder to deliver with precision and engagement, and many struggled with digital access off campus. Providers now retain what worked in blended formats while prioritising on-campus studio time, scheduled online help for commuters or carers, and lending schemes or low-cost alternatives for essential kit.

How do health, safety and wellbeing supports enable learning?

Studios and workshops must be safe and psychologically supportive. Regular risk assessments, clear protocols and approachable technicians reduce anxiety and incidents. With peaks in workload and exhibition deadlines, embed mental health support, short stress-management interventions, and routes into counselling. Keep information current and easy to act on to encourage uptake.

What should universities do next?

Focus effort where students signal the biggest gains: close the disability gap through faster, owned casework; make facilities predictable and IT dependable; simplify timetables and communications; and normalise assessment clarity. Monitor sentiment in both the student support category and design studies to see whether interventions move the dial for the next cohort.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

  • Track support-related topics and sentiment over time for design cohorts, with drill-downs from provider to school and course.
  • Compare like-for-like across CAH codes and student demographics, including disability, mode and age, to evidence whether gaps are closing.
  • Surface operational pain points quickly in facilities, IT and communications; export concise, anonymised summaries for programme teams and professional services.
  • Segment by cohort or site to see where changes to studios, assessment or support move sentiment most, with ready-made outputs for boards and external reporting.

Request a walkthrough

Book a Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

  • All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
  • Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
  • Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.

More posts on student support:

More posts on design studies student views: