How do creative writing students want teaching delivered?
Creative writing students want workshop‑rich, mentored teaching that balances practice with theory, delivered predictably and with transparent assessment. In the National Student Survey (NSS), the delivery of teaching theme captures how students experience structure, clarity and pacing, while the creative writing subject grouping shows what is distinctive in this discipline. Across the survey, full‑time students are markedly more positive than part‑time learners about delivery (+27.3 vs +7.2), and within creative writing the overall tone is positive but mixed, at 55.6% Positive and 42.4% Negative. These patterns guide the analysis below: strengthen structured workshops and peer learning, guarantee parity for part‑time access, and make assessment expectations unambiguous.
In the vibrant area of creative writing, students' distinct experiences shape their views on teaching delivery within UK higher education. Creative writing blends practical craft and literary analysis, so delivery choices matter for student engagement and performance. Staff who tailor sessions to convey technique and stimulate creativity help students translate ideas into polished work. Student voice drives improvement here; text analysis of open‑text comments and regular pulse checks enable programme teams to adjust structure, pacing and support in real time so learning aligns with students’ creative and professional aims.
Why does workshop‑based learning matter?
Workshop‑based learning underpins creative writing programmes and fosters collaborative, iterative practice. Students present work, receive focused peer and tutor critique, and revise. Face‑to‑face discussion often captures nuance in tone and technique, but digital workshops can also sustain interaction if well moderated. Given that collaboration can feel uneven for some cohorts, programmes should design peer review with explicit roles, criteria and time limits so sessions stay productive and inclusive.
How does mentorship provide personalised guidance?
Targeted mentorship helps students refine voice, structure and technique, and supports motivation. Regular one‑to‑one or small‑group tutorials allow staff to differentiate advice by learning style and project stage. Students value responsiveness and encouragement; accessible mentors who calibrate challenge and support tend to unlock progress, particularly when learners feel stuck between drafts.
How should programmes balance theory and practice?
Interleaving theory with practice enables students to apply concepts immediately. Short inputs on narrative perspective, form or genre, followed by timed writing and micro‑critiques, turn abstract ideas into workable craft decisions. This sequencing reduces cognitive load and keeps sessions purposeful, especially when teaching builds from concrete examples to reflection.
What resources and facilities do students need?
Reliable access to readings, quiet study spaces and intuitive digital workflows sustains progress. Library collections, reading‑list availability and e‑resource discoverability matter as much as specialist materials. Stable systems for submissions, feedback and seminars reduce friction for commuter and part‑time students. Where gaps persist, co‑designed fixes with student reps often yield quick wins.
How do diverse and inclusive materials shape learning?
Curricula that foreground diverse voices, forms and cultural contexts broaden students’ repertoires and support ethical, contemporary practice. Analysing texts from varied traditions, then emulating or subverting techniques in workshop, helps students interrogate canon and produce more thoughtful, original work.
Which assessment methods and feedback approaches work best?
Students prefer formative, developmental feedback that shows how to improve the next draft. In creative writing, comments on feedback are often positive, but marking criteria can remain opaque. The marking criteria topic is strongly negative in sentiment (−41.4), which signals the need to publish annotated exemplars, use checklist‑style rubrics and align feedback explicitly to criteria. Predictable turnaround and staged submissions keep assessment credible and manageable. Structured peer assessment templates can extend dialogue while maintaining consistency.
Where do public engagement opportunities add value?
Public readings, festivals and community workshops let students test work with live audiences and build networks. Staff can broker opportunities and prepare students with guidance on pitching, event etiquette and reflective follow‑up so external activity consolidates learning rather than distracting from it.
What should providers do next?
- Close the part‑time delivery gap by providing high‑quality recordings, timely materials and asynchronous assessment briefings. Chunk longer sessions and share concise summaries.
- Lift delivery clarity with a light rubric that covers structure, pacing, interaction and signposting, and share micro‑exemplars of strong sessions.
- Run quick pulse checks after teaching blocks and review results termly with programme teams, focusing on actions that move sentiment for specific cohorts.
- Standardise terminology and slide structures and use short formative checks to reduce cognitive load, especially in sessions that introduce new techniques.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics turns NSS open‑text into actionable priorities for delivery and discipline‑level insight. It tracks topics and sentiment over time for creative writing and for delivery of teaching, with drill‑downs by programme, cohort, mode and age so you can target parity for part‑time learners. Like‑for‑like sector comparisons show where assessment clarity, resources or collaboration need attention. Export‑ready summaries and representative comments help programme teams act quickly and evidence improvement.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on delivery of teaching:
- What does effective teaching delivery look like in veterinary medicine and dentistry?
- How do civil engineering students rate the delivery of teaching?
- What does student feedback say about the delivery of human geography teaching?
- How well is teaching delivered in management studies?