Does UK accounting course content offer enough breadth and relevance?
Yes. Student comments indicate that breadth is welcomed in the type and breadth of course content theme of the National Student Survey (NSS), with 70.6% Positive sentiment, and accounting as a discipline under the sector’s Common Aggregation Hierarchy, accounting, sits at a more mixed 54.5% Positive overall. In sector terms, the category captures how students experience scope and variety, while the CAH grouping enables like-for-like subject comparison. For accounting, students praise range but push for assessment clarity and dependable delivery so breadth translates into learning value.
How does course structure and clarity support learning?
A well-organised curriculum with explicit learning outcomes aligned to professional standards improves comprehension and progression. Students perform better when modules set expectations early, map concepts across the programme, and link to accreditation requirements. Departments that publish a visible “breadth map” and schedule options to avoid clashes enable cohorts to personalise depth without sacrificing coherence. Balance theory with application so core concepts are reinforced through case, project and seminar formats. This combination makes transition to practice smoother and strengthens readiness for professional roles.
Do students get enough breadth and practical relevance?
Students value coverage from financial reporting to ethics but ask for practical modules that mirror day-to-day accounting tasks. Introduced bookkeeping, systems use and balance sheet management within authentic scenarios so foundational theory is applied. Use text analysis of student feedback to identify duplication and gaps, closing them in-year where possible. Protect real choice by timetabling options that create viable pathways and by providing equivalent asynchronous materials so flexible learners can access the same breadth.
How well are real-life examples integrated?
Real-world cases accelerate understanding of complex topics and improve analysis. Prioritise contemporary examples across sectors and scales, rotating datasets and business contexts so students see how principles hold in different conditions. Short pulse checks can identify which examples resonate and where to add or retire cases. This keeps content current and strengthens the link between decision-making in class and consequences in practice.
Which teaching mode works best: virtual or in-person?
Virtual delivery offers flexibility and a wider toolkit of simulations and walkthroughs, while in-person sessions aid complex problem-solving and rapid clarification. Blend modes to match learning outcomes: use online for concept acquisition and repeatable practice; use in-person for worked examples, peer critique and exam preparation. Keep a single source of truth for changes to preserve predictability, and align asynchronous resources to assessed tasks so all students can meet outcomes.
Where do repetition and disorganisation undermine progress?
Unnecessary repetition and muddled sequencing erode motivation and mask learning gains. Run an early audit of module content flows; retire duplicated topics and sequence assessments to show progression. Provide concise signposting within each module (what, why, how, when) and ensure assessment briefs and marking criteria sit alongside the relevant learning materials. Invite week‑4 and week‑9 flags from students to catch issues in time to adjust.
How should the grading system change?
Accounting students judge courses through assessment practices. In the CAH data, Feedback accounts for 10.8% of comments and trends negative, while Marking criteria sentiment sits at −40.3 and Assessment methods at −18.1. The pattern is consistent: opaque criteria, few exemplars and variable turnaround depress sentiment even when teaching and resources are strong. Publish annotated exemplars aligned to criteria, use checklist-style rubrics that define “what good looks like”, and set a realistic service level for feedback return. This supports consistent interpretation across markers and modules and helps students target effort where it counts.
What should departments do next?
Prioritise assessment transparency and operational rhythm so students can exploit breadth. Refresh examples and datasets on a set cadence, ensure option scheduling preserves genuine choice, and integrate practical tasks that mirror workplace realities. Use student pulse checks and annual content audits to close duplication and fill gaps. These moves maintain breadth while improving relevance and predictability—areas where accounting students say the value of variety is won or lost.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics shows how breadth and relevance land with accounting cohorts by tracking comment topics and sentiment over time, from institution to programme. You can compare with peer subjects, including CAH‑level views, and segment by cohort or mode to see where breadth works and where assessment design or timetabling blocks it. The platform produces concise, anonymised briefs and exportable summaries for Boards of Study, annual monitoring and student‑staff committees, so teams can evidence change and target the next set of quick wins.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on type and breadth of course content:
- Does children’s nursing in the UK give students the breadth they need?
- Does UK nursing course content deliver the breadth and relevance students expect?
- Is the content in Childhood and Youth Studies broad and relevant?
- Does physiotherapy course content offer enough breadth for today’s students?