Do communication gaps hold history students back?
Published May 22, 2024 · Updated Oct 12, 2025
communication about course and teachinghistoryYes. Student feedback shows persistent gaps in how programmes communicate, and history cohorts feel the effects most around assessment transparency and disruption. In the National Student Survey (NSS), comments tagged under communication about course and teaching skew strongly negative (72.5% Negative; index −30.0 across 6,214 comments). By contrast, history overall trends more positive (51.9% Positive), yet students flag opaque marking standards as a major drag (Marking criteria −46.8). These sector patterns frame the practical steps below: unambiguous assessment briefs, a single source of truth for updates, and a predictable rhythm of communications that students can rely on.
Effective communication about course content and teaching methods eases transition and reduces noise. By analysing student voice through surveys and text analytics, institutions can see where module outlines, preparatory resources and marking criteria do not land. History’s dense content and historiographical complexity heighten the need for precise, timely information and shared expectations. Setting that baseline supports confidence and engagement from the outset.
Do students have the assumed knowledge and historical context they need?
Many history students report feeling overwhelmed by presumed prior knowledge, especially in broad or unfamiliar periods. State assumptions explicitly in each module and publish bridging resources. Provide glossaries, short pre-term readers and workshops on historical methods. Use accessible formats and plain language so guidance works for diverse cohorts, and signpost study skills consistently. Staff can then calibrate early teaching activity to this shared baseline, reducing intimidation and enabling students to connect historiography, theory and evidence.
How do we demystify the essay in history?
Students struggle when expectations for argumentation, structure and use of evidence remain implicit. Make criteria actionable: publish annotated exemplars, checklist rubrics and plain‑English marking criteria; align feedback to those criteria and commit to realistic turnaround times. Offer short, timetabled workshops on argument, referencing and use of primary sources, with exemplars mapped to the assessment brief and marking criteria.
Why do assignment expectations feel inconsistent, and how do we fix that?
Intra-programme variation in assessment briefs drives confusion. Standardise assignment templates across modules, including purpose, learning outcomes, marking criteria, word limits, and submission norms. Host briefs in a single, authoritative repository with time‑stamped updates and a short “what changed/why/when it takes effect” note. Issue a weekly digest and maintain a short “no‑change window” ahead of assessments so students can plan. Provide a monitored Q&A forum per module where staff clarify queries once, for all.
What is the impact of external disruptions on communication?
Strikes and public health emergencies expose weak information flows. History students value seminar debate and close supervision; when schedules shift, set out catch‑up teaching, adjusted assessment loads and deadlines in one place. Use consistent headers, plain subject lines, and signpost escalation routes and response times. These practices now underpin hybrid delivery and protect the strengths students praise in teaching and resources even during disruption.
How much face-to-face interaction do history students need?
Online tools broaden access but can thin out discussion. Prioritise small‑group seminars and office hours alongside recorded lectures via a flipped model. Be explicit about the balance between scheduled contact and guided independent study, so students understand where feedback and interaction sit within the module design. Publish predictable online availability and keep channels accessible to assistive technologies.
How do we build community connections?
Students engage more when they feel part of a learning community. Use moderated digital spaces and course noticeboards to share updates, but also timetable peer‑learning, history clubs and reading groups. Promote guest lectures, debates and staff‑student mixers to sustain scholarly dialogue. Encourage study groups linked to assessment milestones, supported by clear staff facilitation and spaces (virtual and physical) that foreground academic purpose.
What should history departments do next?
- Make assessment communications explicit and consistent, with exemplars and criteria at the point of task launch.
- Centralise all course updates, use time‑stamped change logs, and publish a weekly summary and predictable response times.
- Set a shared knowledge baseline with bridging resources and early skills teaching.
- Balance online flexibility with timetabled seminars and office hours, and clarify the split between contact time and independent study.
- Use ongoing student feedback to audit clarity, timing and accessibility of communications, and adjust quickly where confusion emerges.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics turns open-text feedback into targeted actions for history and for communication about course and teaching. It tracks sentiment and topics by cohort and segment, highlights where assessment clarity and organisation pull tone down, and evidences strengths in teaching and resources. Teams can drill from provider to programme, compare like‑for‑like across subject areas, export concise briefings for programme teams and academic boards, and monitor the impact of changes over time.
Request a walkthrough
Book a free Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and reporting designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready reporting.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
UK-hosted · No public LLM APIs · Same-day turnaround
More posts on communication about course and teaching:
- What do human geography students need from communication and feedback?
- Can better communication transform zoology teaching?
- What do management students need from course and teaching communication?
- Does communication in medicine courses determine student success?