Can remote learning work for health sciences students?
Yes. When programmes design online delivery around a stable weekly rhythm, remote-first materials and targeted on-site practicals, health sciences students can learn effectively; in the National Student Survey (NSS), [remote learning] is net-negative overall (sentiment index −3.4), with full-time cohorts reading more negative (−11.2) while part-time cohorts are more positive (+6.5). In [health sciences (non-specific)], remote delivery reads only slightly negative (−2.6), but students still press for sharper marking criteria (−42.8). Across the sector the remote learning topic captures how institutions run online teaching and assessment, while health sciences spans clinically oriented programmes where placements and applied skills shape the experience; that context frames the practical choices below.
How should practical and clinical training work online?
Blend theoretical components online with timetabled, short on-site blocks that deliver the tactile elements. Use high-fidelity simulations and structured video demonstrations to prepare students before clinical days, then debrief online to consolidate practice. Lock in predictability early by confirming placement capacity, clarifying expectations and assessment briefs, and sequencing preparatory modules so students arrive on site ready to act. This model protects applied learning while using remote time for decision-making, reflection and case analysis.
What technology and access do health sciences students need?
Prioritise a consistent, low-friction digital experience. Provide remote-first materials as standard: captioned recordings, transcripts, alt-text, low-bandwidth versions, and a single stable link hub per module. Run a short “getting set online” orientation for each cohort and publish a one-page “how we work online” playbook. Maintain asynchronous parity: every live session should have a timely, searchable recording and a concise summary of takeaways. Time-zone-aware office hours and written follow-ups help international learners keep pace. Weekly monitoring of access issues, audio quality, link churn and timetable slips, followed by a brief “what we fixed” update, closes the loop.
How can assessment and examinations be robust online?
Tighten assessment clarity and authenticity. Publish annotated exemplars and checklist-style rubrics for each assessment brief to reduce ambiguity and improve the usefulness of feedback. Where practical assessments move online, combine structured simulations with short, observed on-campus tasks for skills verification. For written work, align marking criteria to learning outcomes and train markers to apply standards consistently across online and in-person cohorts. In health sciences, students read opaque marking criteria most negatively, so transparent standards and rapid, specific feedback matter.
What supports protect mental health and wellbeing?
A predictable weekly rhythm, clear expectations and rapid responses to queries reduce anxiety, especially for full-time and younger students who tend to view remote delivery less positively. Keep visibility high for Personal Tutors and provide easy routes to academic support and counselling services. Build micro-communities through seminar groups, peer mentoring and moderated forums to counter isolation and sustain engagement between clinical blocks.
Can students build professional skills and networks remotely?
Yes, when institutions design these opportunities deliberately. Use virtual employer panels, alumni mentoring and topic-focused discussion groups to develop professional identity and communication skills. Pre-brief and debrief placement activity online to maximise learning value, and connect students across sites to widen networks beyond local clinical partners.
What challenges do staff face in remote delivery?
Staff need to convey complex procedures and tacit judgement online while maintaining engagement. Support this with demonstration capture, checklists and structured interaction in shorter blocks. Name an owner for timetabling and organisation, standardise platforms and joining routes, and equip staff with concise guidance on monitoring progress and following up with at-risk students. Programme teams should review weekly analytics and student comments to target quick fixes that smooth delivery.
Where does remote health sciences education go next?
Focus on reliability before novelty. Iteratively improve the blend: remote-first materials for theory, multi-angle demonstrations for technique, and concise on-site practice for skills sign-off. Segment design choices by mode and life stage to reflect different student preferences, and keep students involved in pilots to refine what works. As programmes stabilise, invest selectively in simulations that demonstrably lift assessment validity or reduce failure points.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
- Track remote learning topics and sentiment over time, with drill-downs to school, department, programme and cohort.
- Compare like-for-like against the wider sector and health sciences peers by mode, age, domicile/ethnicity and disability to target the cohorts most at risk.
- Produce concise, anonymised summaries for programme teams and governance, including the top friction points and what actions will move sentiment.
- Export tables and charts for briefings and continuous improvement cycles, so you can evidence change across modules, placements and assessments.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on remote learning:
- Does remote learning work for English literature students?
- Does remote learning work for mental health nursing students?
- What do accounting students think about remote learning?
- Is remote nursing education working for students?