Do design studies students get value for money?

costs and value for moneydesign studies

Often not at sector level, unless providers reduce out-of-pocket spend and keep studio resources predictably available; strong teaching can tilt perceptions when costs are managed. In National Student Survey (NSS) open-text analysis, costs and value for money comments are strongly negative overall (sentiment index −46.7), while design studies feedback shows teaching is well regarded (+39.6) but value-for-money remains a sore point (3.8% of comments, −54.5). With a student population weighted towards full-time study (78.7%), programmes that publish predictable costs, expand kit access and protect studio time tend to fare better.

Design studies in UK higher education confront a distinct set of financial hurdles. These range across tuition fees, resource accessibility, and the perceived worth of studio time. A critical area often debated is whether the high cost of education in this field aligns with the value received. Tuition, for instance, often exceeds £9,250 annually, pressing students and educators alike to question the sustainability of such expenses in relation to the outputs provided. This scrutiny is intensified by the perspective of the learners themselves. Student surveys and text analysis frequently provide insights into this issue, revealing a mix of satisfaction and concern. On one hand, access to state-of-the-art resources and intensive studio time is viewed positively. Conversely, constraints in budget allocation can also significantly impede the educational experience, limiting students' hands-on engagement with the practical tools and technologies essential for their future careers. The challenge lies not only in justifying these costs but also in ensuring that investments in educational facilities, methodologies, and infrastructures translate effectively into enhanced student outcomes and professional readiness.

What do tuition fees and financial aid look like for design studies?

Higher education in the UK, particularly for design studies, presents a financial challenge marked by tuition fees of around £9,250 each academic year. When accompanying costs such as books, student cards, and notably, printing, are taken into account, the financial strain intensifies. Scholarships and grants help, but eligibility criteria restrict access for many; loans broaden participation but do not remove substantial out-of-pocket purchases of specialised equipment and materials. Providers therefore publish total cost expectations per programme, adopt a “no surprises” cost policy, and expand print/material allowances and kit loans to reduce personal spend. Standardising guidance in module handbooks and the VLE, and setting service targets for reimbursements, improves both recruitment and retention where costs weigh heavily on decision-making.

How has remote learning changed the financial dynamics for design students?

The shift to remote learning changes the cost model rather than removing it. Students may save on commuting and physical materials but often need high-spec hardware and licensed software. Institutions reduce some estate overheads yet face ongoing digital infrastructure and licensing costs, and staff development for online delivery. In design studies student comments, remote learning tends to be viewed less favourably than on-campus studio learning, so providers prioritise access to on-campus kit, predictable hybrid timetabling, and bookable supervised studio sessions. Students value flexibility, but they also want collaborative studio culture and hands-on practice to remain central.

How accessible are essential resources?

The accessibility of software such as Adobe and of specialist spaces like darkrooms or studios varies, shaping preparedness for professional practice. Some universities provide extensive facilities that support a broad range of creative expression; others struggle with limited budgets, reducing access and updating cycles. Student voice shows that strong general facilities and people-centred support enhance confidence for graduate roles, while IT reliability and access remain points of friction. Institutions respond by increasing equipment loans, extending opening hours where feasible, and improving booking transparency and maintenance schedules so students can plan project work effectively.

What hidden and unexpected costs do students face?

Beyond tuition at £9,250 annually, hidden costs include specialised printing papers, fabrics, and premium art supplies required for assessed work. Student groups sometimes contribute to the costs of guest speakers and industry events. Software subscriptions are another recurring expense; full access to the Adobe suite is necessary for digital practice yet often sits outside fee coverage. Student feedback indicates these costs shape project choices and can constrain experimentation. Universities therefore clarify what is essential versus optional, embed cost statements in assessment briefs, provide low-cost alternatives where possible, and use hardship funds proactively at known cost pinch-points, with fast reimbursement operations.

What is the value of campus facilities for design studies?

Well-equipped, accessible campus facilities add substantial educational value by enabling the hands-on learning that employers expect. However, they require sustained investment and active management. Shared studio spaces can foster community and critique but risk overcrowding if timetabling and access policies are weak. Students typically link high-quality facilities to satisfaction and to feeling prepared for employment. Staff gather quick pulse checks after busy periods, adjust access rules in response, and track uptime and booking data to ensure that spending maps to student use and perceived value.

Do international students face different cost pressures?

International students face additional costs for air travel and accommodation transitions, with fewer scholarship routes and visa restrictions that limit work opportunities. Navigating health insurance, banking, and tenancy arrangements can be complex and costly without structured support. Providers simplify pre-arrival guidance, signpost bursaries that include materials and software, and ensure early access to studios, printing credits and equipment loans so international students do not start at a financial disadvantage.

How should we assess overall course value?

Students weigh tangible inclusions (studio access, equipment, software, printing) alongside teaching quality, assessment clarity and industry relevance. When students feel well-prepared for professional practice, the financial investment is viewed more favourably; gaps in access, opaque marking criteria, or avoidable timetable disruption drive dissatisfaction. Programme teams therefore prioritise assessment clarity with succinct marking criteria and exemplars, protect operational rhythm around assessment peaks, and increase authentic, industry-facing briefs. Continuous, visible changes in response to student feedback build trust in value for money.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

Student Voice Analytics pinpoints where value-for-money concerns concentrate for design studies by mode, cohort and topic, linking sentiment to concrete operations such as studio access, IT reliability, timetabling and assessment clarity. It offers like-for-like comparisons across disciplines and demographics, concise anonymised summaries for programme and finance teams, and export-ready outputs for rapid action tracking. Providers use it to publish predictable cost information, target allowances and kit loans where they have most impact, and evidence improvement over time in student perceptions of cost and value.

Request a walkthrough

Book a Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

• All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
• Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
• Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.

Book a demo Prefer email? [email protected]

More posts on costs and value for money:

• Do economics students think UK higher education offers value for money?
• Are business and management students getting value for money?
• Do politics students feel they get value for money?
• Is biosciences education in the UK worth the cost?

More posts on design studies student views:

• Do design studies students get the IT facilities they need?
• Do universities support design students effectively?
• What do design studies students need from module choice and variety?
• Do design studies programmes support personal development?