Are UK art students getting value for money?
Published Mar 05, 2024 · Updated Oct 12, 2025
costs and value for moneyartMostly not. Across National Student Survey (NSS) open-text comments on costs and value for money, 88.3% are negative (sentiment index −46.7 across 5,994 comments), with creative arts among the most critical (−50.4). Within art, value-for-money remarks trend even more negative (−53.5), even as students often rate facilities and community highly. The category aggregates cross-institution value-for-money sentiment, while the art subject grouping captures discipline-specific patterns that shape the analysis below.
What is driving the current value-for-money debate for art students?
Starting university raises direct questions about whether fees and additional spend match the experience. Studio-based learning magnifies this because materials and specialist spaces underpin the curriculum. Pandemic disruption and industrial action altered delivery and access, shifting perceptions of how far the fee buys time, guidance and facilities. Text analysis of student surveys frequently reports dissatisfaction; staff and departments improve value when they act on that evidence to address predictable pressure points.
How do high tuition fees shape perceptions of value?
Students weigh high fees against reduced access to studios and staff contact during disruptions, and against ongoing limits in facilities availability. They query whether fee income reaches front-line teaching and spaces. Programme teams can recalibrate expectations by publishing what fees cover, when added costs arise, and which items are optional. Short pulse checks after high-cost activities, with visible follow-up, help close the loop and rebuild trust.
What financial support would make study sustainable?
Scholarships, bursaries and hardship funds keep many students in study, but access and adequacy often fall short. Institutions should standardise cost guidance in module handbooks and on the VLE, set service targets for reimbursements, and publish turnaround times. Front-load information on included provisions and hardship routes before cost-heavy weeks, and ensure advisers proactively contact full-time and younger cohorts who typically report lower value perceptions.
How do materials and supplies costs affect participation?
Materials and printing can run to hundreds of pounds, and students rarely benefit from the kit bundling common in other disciplines. Departments can reduce out-of-pocket spend by expanding kit and equipment loans, introducing modest material allowances, bulk-purchasing core items, and negotiating supplier discounts. A no surprises policy and minimum notice for any additional spend help students plan.
How have disruptions and delivery affected the university experience?
Disrupted studio time, variable timetabling and uneven communication erode confidence in value. Students link preparedness for employment to consistent access to feedback, space and staff. Naming an owner for timetabling and programme communications, keeping a single source of truth, and issuing brief weekly updates on changes stabilise expectations and reduce unnecessary costs.
What would equitable access to studios and workshops look like?
Access constraints during breaks and assessment periods drive students to pay for alternative workspaces. Extending opening hours, increasing open studio provision, and prioritising access during peak project weeks align institutional practice with assessment expectations. Small targeted grants for workspace access can offset unavoidable external costs for those with limited means.
Where do students need greater transparency?
Students want to see a total cost of study view per programme that states what is included and typical extras by module, with timing. Transparent explanations of constraints and mitigations during sector-wide disruptions build credibility, as does routine publication of how value-focused decisions are taken at school and programme level.
How do accommodation and student discounts influence perceived value?
High rents and living costs compound fees and materials expenses. Universities and students’ unions can negotiate price-capped housing options, local transport discounts and supplier deals for art materials. Make eligibility and access routes visible and easy to claim, and monitor uptake so support reaches commuting and lower-income students.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics pinpoints where value-for-money concerns are sharpest by mode, age and subject, and tracks movement over time. Teams can drill from institution to school and programme to see where spend, facilities access or operations drag sentiment. Like-for-like comparisons across subject groupings and cohorts guide targeted interventions such as cost audits, material allowances and faster reimbursements. Export-ready summaries support swift briefing and action tracking.
Request a walkthrough
Book a free Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and reporting designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready reporting.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
UK-hosted · No public LLM APIs · Same-day turnaround
More posts on costs and value for money:
- Is biosciences education in the UK worth the cost?
- Do politics students feel they get value for money?
- Is English studies good value for money?
- Do Computer Science students think their education offers value for money?