Are accounting students overloaded and under-supported?
Published Apr 15, 2024 · Updated Feb 20, 2026
workloadaccountingYes, and accounting students can be positive about lecturers and resources and still feel overloaded. The pressure point is usually simple: deadlines bunch up, criteria feel unclear, and support isn’t easy to access when it matters most. In the National Student Survey (NSS), workload comments show sustained dissatisfaction (see our NSS open-text analysis methodology): 81.5% are negative (sentiment index −33.6) across 6,847 comments. Within accounting, students are comparatively positive about people and resources (roughly 54.5% positive versus 40.4% negative), yet still describe overload when assessment schedules and expectations don’t line up. The takeaway is practical: sequence assessments across the term, make criteria explicit, and keep staff visibly available at pressure points.
How does heavy workload affect accounting students?
Accounting students in UK higher education often feel pressure from the volume and pace of work. Extensive coursework, tight deadlines, and limited academic support can leave students overwhelmed and at risk of burnout.
Academic teams can keep rigour while protecting wellbeing by smoothing peaks in demand and making support easy to access when deadlines cluster. This reduces last‑minute stress without lowering standards.
How can timetabling reduce exam pressure?
Exam pressure intensifies when high‑stakes assessments coincide with substantial coursework. Map summative deadlines across modules, avoid bunching, and space submissions and exams so students have time to prepare well. Publish a single assessment calendar, minimise late changes, and use short “change windows” so updates do not create last‑minute pile‑ups. Structuring the academic year to include genuine recovery periods improves performance and wellbeing.
When does group work help rather than hinder learning?
Group work develops professional skills but can raise workload and equity issues when expectations and accountability are vague (see challenges of collaborative learning and its assessment). Free‑riding and coordination problems increase stress and reduce learning value. Scaffold team tasks with defined roles, milestones, and a clear route for addressing uneven contribution. Align marking with evidence of individual input so group projects feel fair and enhance learning rather than generate frustration.
What course delivery and structural changes would help?
A one‑size‑fits‑all delivery model rarely matches diverse learning paces. Vary teaching methods, encourage active participation, and keep one source of truth for timetable changes—paired with a brief weekly “what changed and why” update. Better organisation and communication reduce friction and help students stay engaged across demanding modules.
How can assessment methods and grading be fairer?
Heavy weighting of final examinations can distort overall grades and elevate stress. Distribute grades across the term using well‑designed coursework, projects, and low‑stakes quizzes. Publish annotated exemplars aligned to marking criteria, use checklist‑style rubrics that show “what good looks like”, and set a realistic service standard for feedback turnaround. Clear criteria and predictable processes improve perceptions of feedback, assessment methods, and marking.
Which student resources sustain engagement?
Comprehensive resources—structured lecture materials, online tutorials, regular updates, and interactive sessions—help students manage workload and stay engaged. Maintain visible staff presence around assessment points, and offer accessible Q&A routes so students can resolve issues quickly. Use mid‑term “workload check‑ins” to spot overload early and adjust support.
How can students maintain work–life balance?
Signpost time‑management strategies, provide realistic time budgets for tasks aligned to timetables, and design schedules that allow for rest. Embed stress‑management and study‑skills support, and offer practical planning assistance to cohorts that typically report higher pressure (including full‑time and younger students). A culture that values balanced, efficient study helps students sustain performance across demanding periods.
What did COVID-19 change about the learning experience?
The rapid transition to online delivery increased workload for many students and disrupted informal peer support. Retain the effective parts of digital provision—consistent online wayfinding, stable tools and accessible remote support—while ensuring face‑to‑face opportunities for collaboration where they matter most. A resilient blend reduces friction if circumstances shift again.
What should providers do next?
Smooth and sequence workload at programme level, make expectations explicit, and refine assessment design and marking transparency. Keep staff presence high at pressure points, invest in resource quality and communications, and monitor impact through NSS and internal pulse checks so improvements are sustained across cohorts.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics tracks workload sentiment over time (see sentiment analysis for UK universities) and lets you drill down from provider to school, department, and programme, with demographic cuts and subject groupings that include Accounting. It produces concise, anonymised summaries and export‑ready tables for rapid briefings. Where sector comparators exist, it supports like‑for‑like benchmarking by CAH code and demographics, so you can see whether issues are isolated or systemic. You can validate workload expectations with high‑volume cohorts, spot bunching in assessment calendars, and target interventions where they will move sentiment most.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: How does heavy workload affect accounting students?
A: Heavy workloads lead to stress, burnout risk and reduced engagement. Accounting students frequently report pressure from the volume of coursework, tight deadlines and limited academic support, which can undermine both performance and wellbeing.
Q: What can universities do to reduce workload pressure for accounting students?
A: Universities can sequence assessments across the term to avoid bunching, publish a single assessment calendar, provide clear marking criteria and keep staff visibly available at pressure points. Regular workload check-ins help surface problems before they escalate.
Q: How does student feedback reveal workload issues in accounting programmes?
A: Open-text survey responses and module evaluations highlight specific friction points such as deadline clusters, unclear expectations and insufficient support (see our student feedback analysis glossary for definitions). Analysing this feedback by cohort and demographics allows institutions to target interventions where they will have the greatest impact.
Request a walkthrough
Book a free Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and reporting designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready reporting.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
UK-hosted · No public LLM APIs · Same-day turnaround
Related Entries
- What are accounting students telling us about teaching delivery?
- Do accounting students get the support they need?
- Are adult nursing students’ workloads manageable?
- What are accounting students telling us about university life?
- NSS open-text analysis methodology for UK HE
- Sentiment analysis for UK universities: a practical guide