What are students actually saying about Year abroad (NSS 2018–2025)?

Students discussing Year abroad are broadly positive but with clear gaps by subgroup. The majority of comments come from full‑time, younger students, and tone varies by subject area.

Scope: UK NSS open‑text comments tagged to Year abroad across academic years 2018–2025.
Volume: 2,350 comments within this category; 100% sentiment‑scored.
Overall mood: 57.1% Positive, 38.4% Negative, 4.5% Neutral (positive:negative ≈ 1.49:1). Sentiment index: +16.2.

What students are saying in this category

  • Overall tone is net positive, but not uniformly so. The index sits at +16.2, driven by a clear majority of positive comments, yet a sizeable minority (38.4%) report negative experiences.
  • The conversation is dominated by full‑time (97.8%) and younger students (95.5%). Within the category, the largest identifiable subject contributors are Language and Area Studies (12.6% of Year abroad mentions), Business & Management (11.0%), and Social Sciences (7.9%).
  • Tone varies by subject. Business & Management (+36.9) and Biological & Sport Sciences (+33.9) are notably upbeat, while Language and Area Studies is more balanced (+11.6). Small pockets read more negatively (e.g., Mathematical Sciences −8.2; n=11), suggesting targeted review rather than systemic issues.
  • Experience gaps are visible across student characteristics: disabled learners (+6.8) trail their non‑disabled peers (+17.8); mature students (+9.4) report a weaker tone than younger peers (+16.5); and female students (+11.5) are less positive than male students (+26.3). By ethnicity, Asian (+30.4) and Black (+29.5) students are more positive than White students (+14.2). Treat small bases with caution.

Where do Year abroad comments come from (by subject) — and how do they feel?

Note: 49.0% of Year abroad comments have no CAH subject mapping.

Subject area (CAH1) Share % Comments Sentiment idx Positive % Negative %
(CAH19) Language and area studies 12.6 296 11.6 52.7 41.9
(CAH17) Business and management 11.0 258 36.9 71.7 23.6
(CAH15) Social sciences 7.9 185 20.1 60.0 36.2
(CAH20) Historical, philosophical and religious studies 3.4 79 25.7 68.4 29.1
(CAH23) Combined and general studies 2.5 58 13.9 53.4 43.1
(CAH03) Biological and sport sciences 1.7 40 33.9 80.0 20.0
(CAH10) Engineering and technology 1.5 36 35.6 66.7 25.0

Small‑N outliers to watch: (CAH09) Mathematical sciences (n=11; −8.2).

Benchmarks across key subgroups

Group Segment Comments Sentiment idx
Age Young 2245 16.5
Age Mature 81 9.4
Disability Not disabled 1994 17.8
Disability Disabled 332 6.8
Sex Female 1593 11.5
Sex Male 728 26.3
Mode Full‑time 2299 16.3
Mode Part‑time 27 11.2
Ethnicity White 1778 14.2
Ethnicity Asian 162 30.4
Ethnicity Black 63 29.5

Caution: some segments have small bases; treat as directional.

What this means in practice

  • Close the experience gaps

    • Build an inclusive “year abroad journey” for disabled (+6.8) and mature (+9.4) students: accessible information, clear adjustments process, and predictable support before, during and after the year.
    • Track gender differences (female +11.5 vs male +26.3). Use anonymous check‑ins to surface pain points and remove friction in admin and academic processes.
    • Provide part‑time‑friendly timelines and guidance to stabilise tone (+11.2) in smaller cohorts.
  • Standardise operations as a service

    • Single source of truth for requirements, timelines, finance, and credit transfer.
    • Named contact and escalation route while abroad; publish response time expectations.
    • Short pre‑departure checklist and a first‑month “settle‑in” pulse check.
  • Targeted subject follow‑up

    • Maintain strengths where tone is high (e.g., Business & Management, Biological & Sport Sciences).
    • Run lightweight comment reviews with areas showing lower or mixed tone (e.g., Language and Area Studies; small‑N negatives like Mathematical Sciences) to identify specific fixable issues.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

  • Track topic volume and sentiment over time at institution, faculty and programme levels, with drill‑downs by CAH subject, mode, domicile and demographics.
  • Produce concise, anonymised summaries for boards and programme teams, and export evidence for action plans.
  • Enable like‑for‑like comparisons across CAH codes and student segments (e.g., age, mode, campus/site, commuter status) to target interventions where they matter most.

Data at a glance (2018–2025)

  • Volume: 2,350 Year abroad comments; 100% sentiment‑scored.
  • Overall mood: 57.1% Positive, 38.4% Negative, 4.5% Neutral; sentiment index +16.2.
  • Largest identifiable subject contributors: Language & Area Studies (12.6%), Business & Management (11.0%), Social Sciences (7.9%).

How to use this category hub

This page groups Student Voice blog case studies where students talk about Year Abroad (theme: Organisation and management). Use it to find examples, then connect them to evidence you can act on.

  • Scan the most-read posts for patterns and language students use.
  • Use the hub links to move from a theme to programmes/disciplines.
  • Turn themes into evidence via Student Voice Analytics (NSS, PTES, PRES, UKES, module evaluations).

Recommended next steps

  1. Quantify: how often does this theme appear (and where)?
  2. Segment: by discipline (CAH/HECoS), level, mode, and cohort where appropriate.
  3. Benchmark: compare like-for-like to avoid cohort-mix artefacts.
  4. Act: define 1–3 changes, then track whether the theme shifts next cycle.

Subject specific insights on "year abroad"

The Student Voice Weekly

Research, regulation, and insight on student voice. Every Friday.

© Student Voice Systems Limited, All rights reserved.