Do management students think university IT facilities support their learning?
Yes, for routine study needs they typically cope, but reliability, access and communication still constrain satisfaction at critical moments. Across IT facilities comments in the National Student Survey (NSS), tone trends negative overall (−8.2 from 4,428 comments), while business and management sits nearer neutral (−1.1), showing serviceable basics with avoidable friction. Within management studies specifically, the broader experience reads more positively (53.0% Positive, 42.7% Negative), so stabilising digital infrastructure helps sustain a subject that otherwise performs well on teaching, support and career orientation. In the sector, the IT facilities topic spans Wi‑Fi, labs, software access and remote options; management studies spans applied business programmes where group work, data tools and timely feedback expectations are prominent. These patterns steer what to prioritise below.
Recognising student voice through survey analysis and free‑text mining lets institutions align IT services with actual use: reliability around deadlines, frictionless access to specialist tools, inclusive design, and concise status communications.
What IT facilities and equipment matter most for management students?
In UK higher education, Wi‑Fi coverage, lab/device availability, and dependable access to virtual learning environments sit alongside discipline‑specific software. Embedding these tools within modules enables digital submission, analytics, and collaboration. University apps such as ELE and iExeter support navigation of timetabling, library access and assessments. Management cohorts value Microsoft Teams for group projects and real‑time collaboration, with remote desktop or VDI options ensuring continuity off campus. Standardising software versions and licensing, and guaranteeing remote access to specialist tools, reduces avoidable setup delays.
How should IT support operate for management students?
First‑response and fix‑time targets around assessment deadlines reduce disruption. A single live status page, pre‑announced maintenance windows, and short post‑incident summaries give students and staff predictable recovery paths. Helpdesks that provide extended hours via chat and tickets, plus concise self‑help guides, keep students moving. Monitoring uptime and incident metrics for Wi‑Fi, labs and remote access helps teams prioritise fixes before issues escalate.
How does IT use shape the learning experience?
Robust AV and seamless access to databases such as the O’Reilly online library support lectures, workshops and independent study. Ease of navigation in the VLE, stable sign‑on, and quick load times sustain engagement and reduce cognitive load. Institutions that reduce login friction and keep key resources one click away typically see stronger survey commentary, as students can focus on learning rather than troubleshooting.
Which tools best support communication and collaboration?
Discussion boards, project spaces and breakout rooms underpin group work central to management education. Given frequent frustrations with the mechanics of collaboration, programmes benefit from clear task designs, contribution tracking, and staff‑moderated routes for conflict resolution. Digital wellbeing routes and signposting through platforms give confidential support while maintaining academic momentum.
How should resources be organised and accessed?
A coherent student portal that surfaces timetables, submission points, reading lists and software access lowers effort and stress. Effective timetabling systems minimise clashes and late changes, and integration with calendars helps students plan work placements or live projects. Remote access to digital libraries and up‑to‑date e‑books and journals supports commuter and international students and aligns with modern study patterns.
What do students say about current IT systems?
Recurring pain points include intermittent printers, Wi‑Fi dropouts, and unstable video platforms at peak periods. Submission portals and feedback release workflows must operate without errors to sustain satisfaction and academic momentum. Targeted readiness checks before term—verifying software, account access and room configurations—reduce early‑semester disruption. While several subject clusters across the sector are particularly negative about IT, business and management tends to report nearer‑neutral experiences when reliability holds, reinforcing the case for preventative maintenance and transparent communication.
Which actions are universities taking in response?
Many institutions extend helpdesk hours, introduce live status dashboards, and run termly platform updates. Publishing service levels, tracking lab occupancy, introducing fair booking during peaks, and offering evening/weekend access where feasible address capacity. Regular change logs and “what changed and why” updates make course teams and students confident about using systems at scale.
What are the challenges and opportunities in online learning?
Bandwidth constraints and software conflicts can derail live sessions or recorded content access. Yet online modes increase flexibility and access to current resources. Programmes that set explicit expectations for online components, provide offline alternatives for essential materials, and offer remote access to specialist applications maintain parity between campus and remote learners.
What specific IT do management courses require?
Specialist tools for analysis (e.g., SPSS, NVivo), modelling and data visualisation alongside Microsoft Excel and Access are core to applied business tasks. Simulation platforms and strategy tools help bridge theory and practice. Provision should include remote access pathways, step‑by‑step installers, and short skills primers so students can use tools with minimal setup.
Where should system improvements and staff training focus?
Upgrading infrastructure matters, but so does staff capability. Training that helps teaching teams integrate digital tools into assessment briefs, seminars and feedback workflows improves consistency and accessibility. Regular, short refreshers aligned with platform updates maintain confidence and reduce ad‑hoc workarounds during delivery.
What should universities prioritise next?
Stabilise core services, remove access friction for specialist software, plan capacity for peaks, and design for inclusion with assistive tech compatibility, adjustable workstations, quiet zones and robust laptop‑loan schemes. These moves align with how management students study and with the broader pattern of commentary about IT across the sector.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics turns open‑text survey comments into prioritised actions for IT and programme leaders. It tracks topic volume and sentiment over time, with drill‑downs from institution to school and programme. You get like‑for‑like comparisons by subject code and demographics, segmentation by cohort and site, and concise, anonymised summaries with export‑ready visuals to brief IT services, estates and academic teams quickly.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on it facilities:
- Do design studies students get the IT facilities they need?
- Do UK IT facilities meet computer science students' needs?