Mostly, students say not yet: operational delivery still frustrates. In the National Student Survey (NSS), comments about course organisation skew negative (52.2% Negative vs 43.6% Positive), and in tourism, transport and travel the organisation theme records a weak sentiment index of −35.2. As a sector lens, the organisation, management of course theme captures timetables, changes and course communications across UK providers, while the tourism, transport and travel subject group shows how applied cohorts experience these operations. These patterns focus attention on stabilising timetables, setting unmissable expectations, and protecting the staff access students value.
Students in these areas are well placed to reflect on the structure of their programmes. By analysing feedback across UK institutions, we surface where organisation and management help or hinder learning. Using student surveys and text analysis, teams can convert comments into practical changes that build both confidence and competence.
What are the challenges in course organisation?
Students report unclear module structures, late changes and uneven communication that depress both performance and satisfaction. Full-time and younger cohorts tend to be more critical than part-time and mature peers, so course teams should stabilise the former experience and preserve what works for the latter. Administrative delays around timetabling updates and assessment briefs erode trust; a single source of truth for communications, named operational ownership, and rapid triage routes reduce noise. Publish module handbooks and assessment calendars early, and keep them aligned with what students encounter in the virtual learning environment.
Where do guidance and support need to improve?
Students want predictable access to people who can help. Availability of teaching staff and personal tutors reads strongly in this subject, so protect those touchpoints while ensuring advice connects to module expectations and assessment briefs. Disabled students tend to report more negatively on course operations; provide accessible, machine-readable schedules, alternative arrangements for clashes, and explicit routes for adjustments. Use regular feedback loops to show how student input changes practice.
How can timetabling and scheduling conflicts be reduced?
Clashes and late moves drain time and goodwill. Publish timetables earlier with a defined change window, track timetable stability and minimum notice periods, and issue a short weekly “what changed and why” update. Coordinate across departments before release and agree service levels with technical and room-booking teams. Scheduling tools that expose live cross-programme views help detect overlaps early. Offer options for seminars or practicals where feasible to give students agency without fragmenting the cohort experience.
How can writing and project skills be improved?
Students often need sharper guidance on expectations, particularly where projects simulate live briefs. Make assessment expectations unmissable: provide annotated exemplars, checklist-style rubrics and clear turnaround standards. Build discipline-specific writing and project workshops into the programme and use peer review to normalise iterative drafting. Align formative tasks with summative criteria so feedback supports progression rather than rework.
How should technological challenges be addressed?
When delivery shifts online, students notice platform inconsistency and unreliable connectivity. Remote learning reads weakest among teaching delivery topics in this discipline, so consolidate on robust tools, provide offline-accessible materials and ensure synchronous sessions have asynchronous equivalents. Offer lightweight training for students and staff on how to use the platforms that the programme actually mandates.
How can practical learning opportunities be enhanced?
Applied learning is a strength when it is well scoped and supervised. Placements, fieldwork and trips build confidence when placement briefs, supervision and on-site feedback are consistent. Use live case studies with local partners and align fieldwork with module outcomes. Co-design practical components with industry professionals to ensure relevance and to scaffold the transition from classroom to workplace.
How can networking and real-world experiences be strengthened?
Industry engagement lifts motivation and employability. Organise networking events and embed industry-facing opportunities within modules, not just as extras. Career guidance reads as a visible strength in this subject, so integrate careers input into assessment weeks and signpost routes into internships, live projects and graduate pathways. Encourage conference attendance and practitioner talks that connect theory to current practice.
What should providers do next?
Act on the operational basics that matter most to this cohort. Given that 75.7% of comments come from full-time students, stabilise the full-time experience and codify practices that support mature and part-time learners. Preserve strengths while you fix the irritants: keep staff access visible, simplify communications, and standardise handbooks and assessment calendars. Measure and close the loop: track response times to student queries, time-to-resolution, change lead time and backlog by theme; review sentiment monthly by cohort and mode and publish actions taken. Part-time cohorts report strongly positive experiences on course organisation (index +34.3); use their practices to inform programme-wide standards.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and standards and NSS requirements.